Would you take Blaize back?!?

https://au.news.yahoo.com/panthers-in-telling-backflip-on-blaize-talagi-after-shock-return-to-parramatta-eels-floated-005647610.html

Panthers may be rethinking their plans for Talagi after shifting him to centre in NSW Cup last weekend. As you know he's been left out of Penrith’s squad for Round 1, with Jack Cole named at 6 instead.

He played five-eighth in NSW Cup’s opening round but was moved to centre in the second game, mainly due to defensive concerns as per Cleary @ 6.

Chammas suggested whether Parra would take him back to replace DB and at the very least ask the question for a possible return.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I prefer Sanders if we cannot get Galvin.

  • we have enough rookies we need some grunt and fit middles to defend properly ...Is Reuben Cotter available or Liam Martin lol

  • Galvin would be too expensive u know we're missing 4 props

    • Look at Parramatta junior

      Keppie Souths

      Lasalo Roosters 

      Didn't mind the 13 from Souths workaholic from Rocky 

  • They all eventually come back home 

  • Nope. Just sign Trent Toelau.

  • Not a fan of Blaize returning. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
4 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
4 hours ago
More…