Shouldn’t Melbourne’s advantage also be -by coming first be that they play the lowest placed winner from the bottom four
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Hey Carlo, thanks for mentioning that podcast 'Talking Parra' Haynesy as guest appearance, I enjoyed it. Wow shame Smithy didn't get to put that young team together and have them grow and develop as a unit under him. Geez what a talented young…"
"Yeah i get a lot of players are jumping now hoping even just one year of a big pay cheque happens. I don't think Lomax would care if it went longer than a season or two, if he can get reported $1.7 mil a year, so $3.4 mil over 2 years and get out…"
"Yeah true, bit like how Isaac Moses when banned sat in the room of one of his associates and told them what to say mid call."
"More so Japan as their season ends before R360 begins i believe."
Replies
No I disagree. That was when first played eight. Manly have a better advantage now than us even if we win.
Dude stop stressing! You have to beat everyone to be the best!
If we were to beat brisbane we’d have a better chance playing souths in sydney than Melbourne in melbourne.
I disagree, in 2005 we would have beat tigers. I don't care what anyone says. They have struggled against us since too. Some teams just struggle against some teams. We got beat that year by cowboys in a massive shock, but had we not we'd have beat the tigers in the gf.
This prick wants everything handed to him m.
newsflash, you may be a boomer, but the days of having everything handed to you are over.
So basically Pete do you think once they make the eight they should do a lottery to see who you play rather than the rankings where you finished
Those days are far from over. The over-60s are a massive percentage of the population, and they are growing relative to the rest of us. They are a significant political force, and they vote in their own interests. They'll continue to get plenty handed to them.