Replies

    • Wr were absolutely raped by the ref tonight, the cows constantly pushed our tackled players down when getting up to play the ball, it was obvious and ridiculous. 

    • Levy is a complete fwit. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • I agree. They have a massive impact on the game and now seem to be on a ref by ref basis. We are going to have to learn to change styles based on feeling out the ref on 6 agains early in the game.

  • people need to get their rose cloured glass off, the ref was pretty good and as for us getting 6 agains he could of given the cowgirls a lot as we pushed down on them every time they got up to play the ball but didn't. Hopefully they get rid of the 6 again as it was a better game without it. Fantastic wi by the boys though I thought they would of blown the girls off the park but good effort and win and hopefully our ressurgence.

    • Shane, 100% correct

    • I don't mind the 6 again rule, as long as it's used as it was intended, to stop teams like the Roosters from intentionally giving away penalties to disrupt the attacking teams rhythm. I thought the ref last night got it just about right 

      • if used correctly and not so 1 sided and inconsistant which we all know will never happen in the NRL so it will never be a good rule and should be scraped

    • I've never liked the 6 again 

  • I still don't know what happened with that penalty we challenged and won but still had a penalty against us.

  • I thought the ref did a good job, stayed out of it and let the players figure it out. The game just flows so much better. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Is every club depending on who you ask."
7 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"So you're willing to give Melbourne a gold chip just so we can take a bronze chip. That's not smart, that is dumber than dog shit"
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"You've also got to remember Lomax might be more than willing to pay us say $500k in damages (I'm not sure what would be agreed to by the parties or court enforced) in order to get a 3 year $700k contract with the storm."
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"We don't need to pick any sort of fight in this, we don't need to be the aggressor. It is also important that we don't portray ourselves as that.
At this stage there has been no wrong (I think the correct term is "tort") committed. Time is on our…"
3 hours ago
More…