In the Daily Telegraph today " Our future and our savior" sic, that's what they call Arthur!, revealed that they who decide these things had informed him that he was the man for the job meaning the coaching job. It seems he was told this at or near the beginning of the year. Hence, the claim that our administration was testing the situation and would decide in June who the coach would be was a sham and a lie. It was a done deal from the beginning. Those responsible for this should be sacked or should walk.
Who was responsible for this? Was the administrator aware of this? Was the Chairman involved or aware of this? Was the CEO involved? Were the directors involved?
This is such an odd thing I think the NRL and the Integrity unit should be informed.