benedict-brook.png?v=48374413686?profile=RESIZE_400x

Benedict Brook

JANUARY 2, 20217:32AM

 

In the dying days of his presidency, Donald Trump has been dealt a rare and stinging snub with his own party’s members turning against him.

The US Congress on Friday dealt Donald Trump a humiliating blow in his last days in office with the Senate voting overwhelmingly to override his veto of a sweeping defence bill – the first time politicians have done so during his presidency.

It means Mr Trump’s objections to troop withdrawals in Asia and Europe and proposals to rename some military sites that celebrate Confederate leaders can be ignored.

By a lopsided vote of 81-13, well more than the two-thirds of the 100-member chamber required, the Republican-controlled Senate approved the $740.5 (A$960bn) billion National Defence Authorisation Act to fund the military for the next financial year

The Democratic-led House of Representatives had voted 322 to 87 on Monday to override Mr Trump’s veto.

Congress voted down President Trump’s veto of the Defence bill. Picture: BARADAT / AFP.

Congress voted down President Trump’s veto of the Defence bill. Picture: BARADAT / AFP.Source:AFP

Both houses of Congress had easily passed the legislation in early December by strong majorities, but Mr Trump, citing a litany of objections, vetoed it on December 23.

“It’s time for us to deliver this bill,” Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said at the start of Friday’s session.

“It’s our chance to remind brave service members and their families that we have their backs.” The vote completed a stunning rebuke in the waning weeks of Trump’s presidency. It came in an extraordinary New Year’s Day session necessitated by his veto, possibly the final act of the outgoing Congress.

New members will be sworn in on Sunday, just 17 days before Democrat Joe Biden is inaugurated to succeed Trump.

It’s a humiliating blow in Donald Trump‘s last days in office. Picture: SAUL LOEB / AFP.

It’s a humiliating blow in Donald Trump‘s last days in office. Picture: SAUL LOEB / AFP.Source:AFP

TRUMP’S GRIPES

Breaking with members of his party, Mr Trump had criticised the defence bill on numerous grounds.

He called it a “gift” to China and Russia and said it restricted his ability to lower troop numbers in Afghanistan, South Korea and elsewhere.

Trump had bristled at language to rename military installations that currently honour leaders of the breakaway Civil War-era Confederacy.

He also insisted the bill should include a repeal of a federal law, known as Section 230, that provides liability protection to internet companies such as Facebook, Twitter and Google, which he regularly accuses of anti-conservative bias.

There was no immediate reaction on Friday from the President, but earlier, in a series of angry tweets, he denounced the “weak and tired Republican leadership” in Congress, which he said would “allow the bad Defence Bill to pass.” That, he said, would represent “a disgraceful act of cowardice and total submission by weak people to Big Tech.” But members of the president’s own Republican Party – which traditionally prides itself as strong on defence – underscored the importance of the bill.

The bill guarantees defence specing during 2021. Picture: Roslyn Ward / US AIR FORCE / AFP.

The bill guarantees defence spending during 2021. Picture: Roslyn Ward / US AIR FORCE / AFP.Source:AFP

“It’s absolutely vital to our national security and our troops,” said Republican Senator Jim Inhofe, chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

“Our men and women who volunteer to wear the uniform shouldn’t be denied what they need – ever.” Democrats in both chambers had slammed Mr Trump’s veto. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it “an act of recklessness.” Senator Jack Reed, the ranking Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said on Friday on the Senate floor that the bill was “essential” in bolstering the nation’s cybersecurity against the type of widespread targeted attack that recently hit both the government and some private companies.

As to Mr Trump’s remark that Moscow and Beijing might approve of the bill, Mr Reed said that any such suggestion was “completely baseless.”

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I'm sorry, I don't like it. This blog is void, no political left wing statements on this wonderfull site, and needs to be shutdown ASAP.mods?.

  • FFS bring on the footy...

  • WHO. CARES.

    • DID somebody say KFC 

      • Shut up and take my money

        • But its Finger licken Good

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Cʜɪᴇғ - 😘's discussion Paul Kent involved in Street fight video
"What, like he uses his mentally disabled child to escape contracts ?   And he takes a wage from the Ricky Stuart foundation ?  Hitler was too good a human to associate with Ricky Stuart. "
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to EA's discussion Lomax Clause
"Carefull , Kent might come looking for you . I dare say we have seen the last of that flog now.  Him getting speartackled into the tree was pricesless. "
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to EA's discussion Lomax Clause
"Maybe he wanted him to meet the Princess since Dylboobs didn't work out ? "
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Fiddy's discussion Raiders no halfback getting pumped
"You could argue it's because both of those teams have a 5/8 that's capable in the halfbacks absence . Wheras ours isn't anywhere near a smart enough footballer. Plenty of teams with bum coaches have played well over the years on the back of the…"
1 hour ago
More…