Replies

        • Notwithstanding all the rhetoric LB and assume you are right. Would Zac believe it is in his interests to continue to persue the case legally (without Storm's involvement) as it then gives him rights to negotiate with anyone......within the NRL, the only body he currently  cannot deal with. I assume his lawyer will decide if its in his interest's to persue.

          If ZAC has half a brain he would negotiate with Parra (assume they would listen to his plea) and discuss a contract to finish the year with Parra having a club option for another period. That at least would provide breathing room for all parties......I can see our fans going beserk over this but they left Simmonsson off the hook, stranger things happen?

          PS Lomax would start in Reserve Grade?

          • What if we do not have cap space for Lomax? We have 2 spots in our top 30, $120k minimum, to spend.

            So yeah we could have $600k left over but what if that all goes to Lomax and have no money to complete our top 30?

            • Well first things first, you don't know what cap issues are.....can be manipulated very easily.

              Lomax would be the 29th player, that would leave one more if someone became available. He realistically would not stay in Reserve Grade

              Now putting this in perspective, I would see it highly  unlikely probably about a 80/1 chance but cannot see the logic, when putting all the imponderables aside the last thing you would worry about is finding 600k for a player of Lomax's availability playing.

              • We would only need 300k as he would leave mid-season due to pregnancy or whatever....it's kind of his thing

          • You're a consillatory bastard, aren't you? Fuck breathing room!

            Lomax has burnt all his bridges back to Parra and probably StMerge now. 

            He can sell pies at AAMI Stadium for all I care.

            • I am pretty sure "all you care" will be given due consideration.....after we win the case!

              I am not sure that the concilliary bastard is in reference to me....if so, can I suggest concilliatory "old bastard" will make Rudolph more comfortable, he hates ambigous statements that can fall any which way, take his head mounting as an example.....he is a poor loser!

              31054406299?profile=RESIZE_584x

  • Lomax!  Sneaky, snake in the grass. Could nor trust him to not burn your toast. 

    • Lomax will burn your toast and NRL will smear the crud mess through our butter.

      I hate toast scrunge in my butter

  • Japan please give Zac a job

    • No-one wants to eat raw fish off a hairy smelly aussie who will stand up & walk out in the middle of your meal

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hector replied to CarloEEL2's discussion Show of hands
"Im on a pension so fuck it"
46 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"I'll stop rhyming when you stop blowing goats.
I liked it
 "
58 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Ive said from the get-go that controilling Lomax after this year is unlikely, as is a good player swap.
I will call it a win if Lomax sits the year out
 "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"maybe a musical instrument or knitting Randolph......I heard you were once in "bandcamp"???
 
NB Maybe give the poetry thing a miss?"
1 hour ago
More…