The Return Of Joey Lussick

I'm of the understanding that Joey Lussick has an NRL get out clause in his contract with St Helens.

During his time filling in I thought he added great service and had some dynamic runs form dummy half.

He'd slot straight back into the team and fit in well with his old team mates.

Would you take him back?
What's your preferred hooker choice with who we currently have?
Who would you like us to get considering we've only put a max $600k value on the Hooker position?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I agree. His game against Melbourne trumps any game I've seen Reed play. 

      • I agree too - and there's plenty worse than Mitch Rein going around. I'm confident BA could get the best out of Rein in '22 should Mahoney be offloaded early..

  • Would love to have Lussick back for 2023. He did a great job for us this year

  • We better be on the phone to Lussick, Brandon Smith and Korosau right bloody now. I am beyond irate at the club for letting Reed go.

  • I don't think he's the answer.

    • He is better than Rein.

  • Joey Lussick isnt the answer for god sake. 
    A solid bloke but no creative number 9 in the fulltime role. There is a reason he is in the UK with no NRL offers. Just because he has worn a blue and gold jersey before dosnt mean he should be the first considered to join us.

    I cant see us signing anyone of note with the form on the board in the number 9 role. Our recruitment team and list manager have made a statement, they are not going to go over $500k for a number 9. Otherwise we would still have Reed.

  • Lussick is a winner

  • Lussick is like Rein, a poor mans hooker. We wont get Smith unfortunately so give Hands a few games next season and see how he goes. Never know may just be the next big thing.

  • We will not get Brandon Smith so Api Koroisau is our best option. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"It should as he is not a contracted player for them."
11 seconds ago
Gucci replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"100%. Settled and paid Parramatta because of this. But I still think a swap deal is being worked out, they just couldnt get the whole deal done in time. Both the Storm and NRL did not want this to play out in court, it will go back to behind closed…"
1 minute ago
iamnot replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"He annoyed the crap out of me the other night on NRL 360. It was like he was on the Melbourne payroll. The other three panellists were all against him, yet he didn't back down once. "
3 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Wow"
3 minutes ago
More…