The Return Of Joey Lussick

I'm of the understanding that Joey Lussick has an NRL get out clause in his contract with St Helens.

During his time filling in I thought he added great service and had some dynamic runs form dummy half.

He'd slot straight back into the team and fit in well with his old team mates.

Would you take him back?
What's your preferred hooker choice with who we currently have?
Who would you like us to get considering we've only put a max $600k value on the Hooker position?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I agree. His game against Melbourne trumps any game I've seen Reed play. 

      • I agree too - and there's plenty worse than Mitch Rein going around. I'm confident BA could get the best out of Rein in '22 should Mahoney be offloaded early..

  • Would love to have Lussick back for 2023. He did a great job for us this year

  • We better be on the phone to Lussick, Brandon Smith and Korosau right bloody now. I am beyond irate at the club for letting Reed go.

  • I don't think he's the answer.

    • He is better than Rein.

  • Joey Lussick isnt the answer for god sake. 
    A solid bloke but no creative number 9 in the fulltime role. There is a reason he is in the UK with no NRL offers. Just because he has worn a blue and gold jersey before dosnt mean he should be the first considered to join us.

    I cant see us signing anyone of note with the form on the board in the number 9 role. Our recruitment team and list manager have made a statement, they are not going to go over $500k for a number 9. Otherwise we would still have Reed.

  • Lussick is a winner

  • Lussick is like Rein, a poor mans hooker. We wont get Smith unfortunately so give Hands a few games next season and see how he goes. Never know may just be the next big thing.

  • We will not get Brandon Smith so Api Koroisau is our best option. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Guess what? Every team tries to manipulate rules to their advantage. If a team is better at it than others then good on them, every team does it. Doesn't mean the sole reason they are winning. 
Can you please, please answer me this question. Is the…"
3 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"A very good read, once again.
Some take aways for me.
i. I can now see why the NRL wanted to change the kick off rule giving the defending team the right to kick off or receive after a try against them. If the game is to stay as is. This rule is a…"
10 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Not always the penalty counts! It depends where exactly the penalty was given, the amount of set restarts and what tackle it's given on, where on the field. Like I said Penrith are experts at it and are able to manipulate the referees exactly when…"
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Yeah worked for the Warriors winning 10-1 penalty count.....oh wait no they lost.
Well I mean Dragons won 10-5 coun....oh they lost too.
Difference is Penrith are just that good and they had on penalty more on Friday night."
42 minutes ago
More…