The next CEO is perhaps the most crucial appointment in the brief history of the NRL. Whilst acknowledging that the CEO appointment after the Super League war was crucial, I'm not sure that we've had a CEO that has truly connected with what the game has needed. This next appointment must get it right.Why not from within?Whether it be by perception or by fact, it would be fair to say that many pundits agree that the current administration has missed the mark in a number of significant aspects of the game. Salary cap messes, inconsistent player penalties and suspensions, media rights, venue decisions, match scheduling, referee standards, drug testing/ ASADA debacle, franchise insolvencies, fan engagement - the list of dramas that never seem to be solved is a long one.To my way of thinking, the administration of the NRL is not a dictatorship with one bloke making the decisions regarding these issues. He relies on his fellow executives for guidance. Therefore, it is the current executive that must be held accountable for the direction that the NRL has taken under the stewardship of Smith. Indeed, he was a result of recruitment from outside the organisation, but both the organisation and the executives must be equally responsible for any shortcomings that he had as the Chief Executive of the game. Using this logic, to promote from within is simply a perpetuation of the errors of our current administration and a reward for someone that many will view as being complicit in any current failures emanating from the NRL hierarchy.Importantly, the next appointment must distance itself from any link to current clubs. Again it becomes an issue of perception. Any decision made that impacts upon the appointee's past club would always come under the microscope. The NRL cannot afford such speculation about perceived bias.It's rare that I agree with the comments of Phil Gould, but I'll agree with his sentiments. He stated that the new CEO must have the business acumen to head an organisation like the NRL, but they need not have the rugby league background. He then stated that the person must have people around them that possess the understanding of the game. (By this it would mean a deep understanding of the game - in my opinion we can't appoint someone who has no clue about rugby league)Considering Gould's comments, I wonder whether he was hinting that any failures were not just attributable to Smith, but to those in high ranking positions around him. Perhaps those executive might do well to retain their positions, rather than consider themselves as candidates for the top job.I'm not advocating cleaning out the upper echelons of the NRL right now. Im sure that there are talented people within the organisation. Nonetheless, now is not the time for promoting from within. We need to get the right CEO from outside and that person then needs to quickly evaluate the executives who are guiding our game.Let's get it right this time.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Wiz, I thought that maybe there was that inference. I truly believe that we cannot afford to go with Greenberg. It wouldn't matter what club he was affiliated with in the past, I just don't buy into anything that he says - he says a lot without actually saying anything. Furthermore, he's been Smith's right hand man. Enough said.
  • I see where you're coming from Sixties and to some extent, I agree, but if there's one league official I think is deserving of the role based on what he's done & achieved, it's Graham Annesley. 

    • I agree as well.
  • I don't think Greenberg or Richardson have the credentials to be CEO of the NRL. Their performance at club level becomes more questionable with every scandal they buried and they have delivered little while at the NRL in my opinion.

    Parramatta and the NRL need the same sort of person. Highly credible, experienced, leader who has no affiliation with the club(s).

    While it might be a minor point in the scheme of things, the NRL needs to give more access of their executive ranks to the fans. In the days of gallop and annesley, they were on the radio / call in programs every weekend. We hardly hear from the NRL executive and as someone wrote this week, no one can even recall the name of the COO who is coping $400k.
  • Then my thoughts on Annesley would be that he should be in Greenberg's position, but not with Greenburg in the top job. I do acknowledge that any opinion of mine is based on looking from the outside in. We won't be privy to the candidate list or the selection process. As outsiders we can only offer thoughts about who we rated in the visible, identifiable aspects of the job. We know nothing of the internal workings/limitations of the organisation.
  • You have to remember, that was some years ago now. 

    Since then, Annesley has worked with major international corporations, enjoyed a fruitful career in politics and has done a ripper job with the Titans and helped them immensely, particularly off the field. Their financial status is improved under him, their organisational structure is improved under him and he's made tough decisions that have helped the Titans club to become a better club moving forward. 

    Not to mention that preceding all of that, even his time as COO, he was the NRL's Director of Football and did a quality job in that role as well.

    He knows the game well having been around it for so long and is a former ref as well, so he has the know-how, the experience and the RL smarts to go into the role.

    And we won't take crap from anyone and will come down hard on any offenders of any range, like we've seen with the Titans players that have overstepped the mark.

    And he's revered among many in the RL community at high levels. 

  • So the same royal commission who hired smith gets tondo the hiring again! It should be like in the U.S. where each club appoints a member to be on the executive committee and a mojority vote appoint the CEO and also had the ability to fire if the CEO is seen to be detrimental or in other words like David Smith.
  • They should sign Scott Seward.
  • Why not Bill Moss?

  • Nice one Sixties.

    I believe the CEO will be appointed from outside the game - I certainly hope so anyway. This billion dollar business needs a CEO who, above all else, knows how to run a business - both financially and from a leadership perspective.

    The rugby league smarts should come from the people he has around him - and herein lies the  current and future problem. Green berg and Richardson - what do they do and what have they achieved? Answering this question is harder than answering how Interstellar could be physically possible.

    The commissions biggest failings are Greenberg and Richardson - not Dave Smith. I believe Annesley is worthy of a front line role but not CEO at this point.

    Someone like Katie Page or Gerry Harvey would be outstanding in my opinion - but that obviously isn't a reality.

    Interesting times :)

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Five-Eighth
"Junior got named not senior for Grothe.
That is why I prefer modern day discussion as it is someone other than Kenny it would be a quick survey"
3 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Five-Eighth
"It's Grothe Junior Poppa, this is modern day. 1998 onwards."
4 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Five-Eighth
"This is 1998 onwards."
5 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Five-Eighth
"So why is Guru Grothe if that's the case"
6 minutes ago
More…