The Eels Helped By The NRL Again !

On Fox Sports News tonight they report that Ryan Matterson has got off scot-free from his charge of a head tackle. This is another example of favoritism to the Eels! Of course, I jest. In fact, I can't remember one occasion when the NRLhas has done anything for the Eels and I go back a long way. It seems Ryan pleaded guilty and the NRL cleared him of any penalty. Itis a bit of good fortune to come our way for an important match. Does the NRL want the Storm to be beaten?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Suck it up Craig 

  • Sucked in!!!

  • Smith only has to come out and say he's retiring and suddenly the Storm would be given every 50/50call six again whatever to ensure he goes out a winner.What the NRL needs this year is an Eels v Panthers Grand Final.Make it happen.

  • Fuck the storm

  • For a change Robert, your summation is only partially inaccurate.

    Ryan Matterson was cited for a crusher by the Bunker but it was downgraded, rightfully so, by the MRC to a grade one high contact, which meant with an early plea he would be free to play. 

  • Very surprised Matto was let off for that one. Maybe it was an attempt at an apology for the Will Smith debacle.

  • He didn't get off scott free. He was charged with a grade one, dangerous contact to the head/neck. He pleaded guilty, copped a fine and 75 points.

    •  Sir SuperEel22: The report on Eox that I saw only indicated something like No suspension or Case dismissed in meaning. I never saw anything going into the fine detail of why it happened.

      • That's why you don't trust Fox. The club website has the full details of our MRC charges from the game: https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2020/09/27/matterson-charged-by-m...

        Matterson charged by Match Review Committee
        Parramatta Eels forward Ryan Matterson was been charged by the NRL Match Review Committee with a Grade One Dangerous Contact – Head/Neck following th…
  • Notwithstanding the inaccuracies of the post as outlined by others, if hypothetically the nrl did want a certain team to win (assuming it would be for the betterment of the game financially or otherwise) that team would be the storm.

    This is because it means parra still play next week which means more interest in week 2 of the finals than if the storm were playing. Stating the obvious but far more parramatta fans and probably far more opposition fans wanting parra to fall in a heap (so they too would have more interest next week if parra were playing).

    Therefore if there is corruption as to the extent fans (not just parra fans) suggest, or straight up say, than Melbourne will get all the calls.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Flegg win against Storm
"Some players need to get sacked from a club and risk losing it all before they really knuckle down and put in the work.  Why did he get sacked, was it lack of discipline for footy and training or off field issues?"
22 minutes ago
Parraboy replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Flegg win against Storm
"Nah I didn't watch the game I don't have too watch one game for my statement to be made I've seen enough in 2 years. His overrated"
1 hour ago
LB replied to EA's discussion Your Line up for next week?
"I love Twidle, you can just tell he is not a robotic NRL player, he plays with instincts. Not saying he is Munster, but Munster plays the same. Apa gets the ball, looks to see what is infront of him and says "Let's try this". That can be dangerous…"
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to EA's discussion Your Line up for next week?
"Iongi
Samrani
Simonsson
Penisini
Russell
Pezet
Moses
Williams
Smith
Moretti
Kautoga
Guymer
Doorey
Walker
Paulo
Tuivaiti
Latu if Ryles thinks he is ready
Izack Tago if we get him
Twidle

 
I thought I posted this earlier including explanations but…"
2 hours ago
More…