The Eels Helped By The NRL Again !

On Fox Sports News tonight they report that Ryan Matterson has got off scot-free from his charge of a head tackle. This is another example of favoritism to the Eels! Of course, I jest. In fact, I can't remember one occasion when the NRLhas has done anything for the Eels and I go back a long way. It seems Ryan pleaded guilty and the NRL cleared him of any penalty. Itis a bit of good fortune to come our way for an important match. Does the NRL want the Storm to be beaten?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Suck it up Craig 

  • Sucked in!!!

  • Smith only has to come out and say he's retiring and suddenly the Storm would be given every 50/50call six again whatever to ensure he goes out a winner.What the NRL needs this year is an Eels v Panthers Grand Final.Make it happen.

  • Fuck the storm

  • For a change Robert, your summation is only partially inaccurate.

    Ryan Matterson was cited for a crusher by the Bunker but it was downgraded, rightfully so, by the MRC to a grade one high contact, which meant with an early plea he would be free to play. 

  • Very surprised Matto was let off for that one. Maybe it was an attempt at an apology for the Will Smith debacle.

  • He didn't get off scott free. He was charged with a grade one, dangerous contact to the head/neck. He pleaded guilty, copped a fine and 75 points.

    •  Sir SuperEel22: The report on Eox that I saw only indicated something like No suspension or Case dismissed in meaning. I never saw anything going into the fine detail of why it happened.

      • That's why you don't trust Fox. The club website has the full details of our MRC charges from the game: https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2020/09/27/matterson-charged-by-m...

        Matterson charged by Match Review Committee
        Parramatta Eels forward Ryan Matterson was been charged by the NRL Match Review Committee with a Grade One Dangerous Contact – Head/Neck following th…
  • Notwithstanding the inaccuracies of the post as outlined by others, if hypothetically the nrl did want a certain team to win (assuming it would be for the betterment of the game financially or otherwise) that team would be the storm.

    This is because it means parra still play next week which means more interest in week 2 of the finals than if the storm were playing. Stating the obvious but far more parramatta fans and probably far more opposition fans wanting parra to fall in a heap (so they too would have more interest next week if parra were playing).

    Therefore if there is corruption as to the extent fans (not just parra fans) suggest, or straight up say, than Melbourne will get all the calls.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Drinking the pre season Kool-aid
"I know some of our injury issues were unavoidable,  but I think its no coincidence our head of physical development was brought over from the spoon winning Newcastle knights.   The number of soft tissue injuries are off the scale.   "
10 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Jaydn Su’A Commits to Parramatta Eels (Official Club Statement)
"Minimum 1.3 probably 1.5 mil to get him."
15 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Drinking the pre season Kool-aid
"Nothing wrong with optimism. Deep down it's all Eels fans have. As far as predicting our success, help me, you seem to have some good insight. I've been trying to predict it for over 25 years, some here, for over 40. "
17 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Drinking the pre season Kool-aid
"What's wrong with being optimistic? I'll be impressed when someone correctly predicts (so that's ahead of time) our success, not failure after it's occurred. So much commentary on here is past tense and completely focused on our flaws. "
29 minutes ago
More…