The attached picture shows that if it went to the bunker it would of been rubbed out anyway as an obstruction so let's all stop complaining about it.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I'm not sure we are in a position where we "need" to do anything. That's not a great place to be. If we want to be like those clubs you've mentioned we should start behaving like them, and that's what we are seeing the beginnings of right now. "
"Yes, clubs must spend a minimum 97.5% of the cap. Top 30 settled by 30 June. We have over five months to pick up handy mid-season buys like Walker or TDS last year. We aren't panicking or as desperate as we have been in the past or we would have…"
"He bought the McMansion before he had a secure contract. Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb.
Financial pressure mounts day by day as he remains unemployed.
Not on the Eels. Not on the Storm.
On him."
Financial pressure mounts day by day as he remains unemployed.
Not on the Eels. Not on the Storm.
On him."
"I think by Round 1 I believe? Not 100% sure on the 97.5% question.
As for your idea of having players come to us instead of chasing. Not happening, we are not Roosters or Melbourne or Penrith where you ring their agent and they want to go…"
As for your idea of having players come to us instead of chasing. Not happening, we are not Roosters or Melbourne or Penrith where you ring their agent and they want to go…"
Replies
This coming from a juvenile, smutty little twat that calls himself 'vertical smile'!!
Fair dinkum! You're the sort of 'limited' person who watches re-runs of John Hopoate sticking his finger up players' dates and doing 'that's gold'!
Drinking Bundy OG and watching Fatty on the Footy Show box set.
Stop with the bold italics. Your not in the office.
Actually they ruled on the knick on bunker never checked the try as they could only rule on the captain's challenge.
The system is confusing and ridiculous
It's actually easy to be negative when you support this club
Flicking through your posts one would be mistaken for concluding you are this site’s most negative person. So often your comments are laced with a putdown against the other person, who, in the main are simply putting forward their opinion. I have said it before ‘pot calling kettle black’. Chill, smell the roses, find a hobby.
OK - so I am more than a little confoozed here.
A tip on, that allegedly goes forward is now a Knock on?
In the past tip ons, that travel forward have been called a forward pass.
You will see one in the Cows (?) I think which is a forward pass.
A knock-on is committed when, in an attempt to play at the ball, a player knocks the ball towards their opponents' dead ball line with their hands or arms and it touches either the ground, or an opposing player. However, the ball may be knocked back.
At which point did the ball touch an opposing player or hit the ground?
Another "Penalty" Peranara Pathetic Perfomance.
The bottom line has become "If a player does not catch the ball 'cleanly' then it will be deemed a knock on regardless of the direction the ball may take after being touched" - That is now how 99.99% of these issues are adjudicated on field.
THERE WAS NO KNOCK ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Amazing what you can learn from all the geniuses on twitter, hey Offside?
I Don't have Twitter don't understand the attraction to it my mate sent that to me.
I think it should be a try but the way they rule most obstructions as a no try I and watching the play again if it was sent up for review it would of been interesting.
what the photo doesn't show is a milli second later the player is free to chase, Fergo from the position HE put himself in.. he wasn't impeded . Don't forget it was a tap on by king Gutherson .. that's how fast the play was .. so stop thinking about it
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next