Replies

      • This coming from a juvenile, smutty little twat that calls himself 'vertical smile'!!

        Fair dinkum! You're the sort of 'limited' person who watches re-runs of John Hopoate sticking his finger up players' dates and doing 'that's gold'!

        • Drinking Bundy OG and watching Fatty on the Footy Show box set. 

           

      • Stop with the bold italics. Your not in the office.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Actually they ruled on the knick on bunker never checked the try as they could only rule on the captain's challenge.

      The system is confusing and ridiculous 

    • It's actually easy to be negative when you support this club

    • Flicking through your posts one would be mistaken for concluding you are this site’s most negative person. So often your comments are laced with a putdown against the other person, who, in the main are simply putting forward their opinion. I have said it before ‘pot calling kettle black’.   Chill, smell the roses, find a hobby. 

  • OK - so I am more than a little confoozed here.

    A tip on, that allegedly goes forward is now a Knock on?

    In the past tip ons, that travel forward have been called a forward pass.

    You will see one in the Cows (?) I think which is a forward pass.

    A knock-on is committed when, in an attempt to play at the ball, a player knocks the ball towards their opponents' dead ball line with their hands or arms and it touches either the ground, or an opposing player. However, the ball may be knocked back.

    At which point did the ball touch an opposing player or hit the ground?

    Another "Penalty" Peranara Pathetic Perfomance.

    The bottom line has become "If a player does not catch the ball 'cleanly' then it will be deemed a knock on regardless of the direction the ball may take after being touched" - That is now how 99.99% of these issues are adjudicated on field.

    THERE WAS NO KNOCK ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  •  Amazing what you can learn from all the geniuses on twitter, hey Offside?

    • I Don't have Twitter don't understand the attraction to it my mate sent that to me. 

      I think it should be a try but the way they rule most obstructions as a no try I and watching the play again if it was sent up for review it would of been interesting.

  • what the photo doesn't show is a milli second later the player is free to chase, Fergo from the position HE put himself in.. he wasn't impeded . Don't forget it was a tap on by king Gutherson .. that's how fast the play was .. so stop thinking about it 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Who Said Trials Mean Nothing?
"As a fan I don't look at the score it gives me a chance to hone in on certain things much like last year all I looked at was the middle of the ruck purely because for me as a fan I wanted to see a game we can take to Melbourne and win with.
Pre…"
18 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"JDB starts every game at 13 imo I like what he does round the middle of the ruck and brings physicality to our middle.Saw it in the roosters trial his wrestle second man in murders a play the ball it's so slow it's great for us.
Walker I'm not…"
26 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Above our pay grade LB that's what JR gets paid the big bucks for.
Like I mentioned if Smith is still garnering the majority of the minutes year end I think the answers simple.You pay Smith and if TDS wants to explore options elsewhere cut bait and…"
34 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"I agree TDS definitely features in our best 17 but we've got to get him right for the back half of the year. I don't think playing 15mins tops off the bench is doing any favours atm. A little time in NSW cup honing his craft will do him wonders I…"
52 minutes ago
More…