Replies

      • This coming from a juvenile, smutty little twat that calls himself 'vertical smile'!!

        Fair dinkum! You're the sort of 'limited' person who watches re-runs of John Hopoate sticking his finger up players' dates and doing 'that's gold'!

        • Drinking Bundy OG and watching Fatty on the Footy Show box set. 

           

      • Stop with the bold italics. Your not in the office.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Actually they ruled on the knick on bunker never checked the try as they could only rule on the captain's challenge.

      The system is confusing and ridiculous 

    • It's actually easy to be negative when you support this club

    • Flicking through your posts one would be mistaken for concluding you are this site’s most negative person. So often your comments are laced with a putdown against the other person, who, in the main are simply putting forward their opinion. I have said it before ‘pot calling kettle black’.   Chill, smell the roses, find a hobby. 

  • OK - so I am more than a little confoozed here.

    A tip on, that allegedly goes forward is now a Knock on?

    In the past tip ons, that travel forward have been called a forward pass.

    You will see one in the Cows (?) I think which is a forward pass.

    A knock-on is committed when, in an attempt to play at the ball, a player knocks the ball towards their opponents' dead ball line with their hands or arms and it touches either the ground, or an opposing player. However, the ball may be knocked back.

    At which point did the ball touch an opposing player or hit the ground?

    Another "Penalty" Peranara Pathetic Perfomance.

    The bottom line has become "If a player does not catch the ball 'cleanly' then it will be deemed a knock on regardless of the direction the ball may take after being touched" - That is now how 99.99% of these issues are adjudicated on field.

    THERE WAS NO KNOCK ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  •  Amazing what you can learn from all the geniuses on twitter, hey Offside?

    • I Don't have Twitter don't understand the attraction to it my mate sent that to me. 

      I think it should be a try but the way they rule most obstructions as a no try I and watching the play again if it was sent up for review it would of been interesting.

  • what the photo doesn't show is a milli second later the player is free to chase, Fergo from the position HE put himself in.. he wasn't impeded . Don't forget it was a tap on by king Gutherson .. that's how fast the play was .. so stop thinking about it 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"There's no upside to going to Melbourne and trying to fill those big shoes. Look at Man U since fergie retired. You're on an absolute hiding to nothing. If he takes us to the promised land he will be as revered as Jack Gibson"
39 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"This has all played out way too quickly for PVL to have had much say. The only thing PVL has said so far is he would of liked to get a deal done. Things then went legal and PVL would not be able to make any public comment right now. He will wait for…"
45 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"Papenhausen and NAS. At least 1.5 there"
48 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to CarloEEL2's discussion New training shirt with suburbs
"No but it has Telopea. Same same"
55 minutes ago
More…