Replies

  • Hopefully Hawkins brings some organisation.

    Glad they stuck with Samarani.

    I can see why he's picked this team he's going to play through the Dogs that's the way to beat them don't go around them.

    Interesting to see if we see any off loads this week.I'm hoping it's big bodies hitting holes is the plan this week.

    • Yep with their smaller pack you cannot go around them. Have to go through them.

  • Eels by 10 and MOM: Hawkins

  • This seems to me there's a rift in some senior players

    • No Cartwright on either team or injured list. Played 44 mins in cup for 4 hit ups and 18 metres? If there is any rift they need to grow up cause no one is playing up to standard bar maybe Williams. In 2 games we have only had 3 players make over 100m - Williams x 2, Hopgood and Paulo. Tigers and Storm each had 3 + 11 backs over 100m to our 8. We can only get better but can't see a win until we get some better go forward. Having a front rower play against us for 65 minutes on the weekend and make 176m and 43 tackles is enough to tell you our effort is not where it needs to be.

  • 🤦🤦🤦

  • Lane, Williams and Hopgood should be a very decent pack vs the Dogs backrowers and lock.
    Tuivati has been strong in very short stints. Doorey goes ok but he's an edge player so I guess Williams can go to the middle.
    Joe O and Jnr are a problem. Name me another NRL side with starting props of that quality. If they can't get over the top of Max King and Josh Curran (which is also a horrible starting front row) than they should be sent to Ron Massey Cup. 
    On paper we match up ok against this Dogs side. No excuses. None.

    • We may look better on paper, but the doggies have acclimatised to ciraldos system

    • I would start with Matto and bring Paulo off the bench. Doorey to drop out of the side.

    • The difference is the Canterbury pack are much more connected and believe in what they are doing and their defensive resolve. We do not but can only improve on the first 2 weeks. It would be nice to get an early try to give some confidence.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Michael W. replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"I really don't think we chased him. We put in an expression of interest with his management, if he was interested we would have heard something. I think the Broncos would have paid a lot more for him than what we would have offered. Broncos need him…"
5 minutes ago
Pato replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Haven't the Warriors said that they want fair compensation via a player swap to release Barnett?
If that is legitimate, who do the Broncos plan on swapping him with?"
8 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"He already had a deal on the table before he asked for a release. Who do you think he is? Lomax?"
10 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Don't see what the big thing is about Barnett "
25 minutes ago
More…