The ref ruled it a 20m restart cause de silva kicked it dead after he knocks on. That was the second infringment though should it not just be a knock on?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Not if he's getting 1.5mill a year, not strange at all."
"No guarantee it even gets off the ground, could be years away 😂"
"No they get respiratory complications instead"
"Is it his manager trying to get his client more money and more a cut for himself? Or did Lomax ask him to look at it. Surely his agent doesn't just do this without asking Lomax first but then again Lomax also did take less money to come to…"
Replies
Yes, but it's Sutton and he makes a lot of mistakes lol
Yeah was weird, I bet if it went over the sticks he wouldn't have ruled it a field goal.
Seems like a blatant error to me.
Yeah, ref got it wrong. We'd burnt our challenge.
It's weird to me how the bunker tips the ref they've made a mistake sometimes, but not others
Correct.
My understanding of the rule is that after a knock on the ball is still live. The attacking team can regather possession to kill the ball. But after tallym kicked the ball, it was still live until it went dead in goals. I believe it was the correct call
Interesting. Does that mean if he did the same thing on our 20m line and kicked it into the Storm's half, that it would be play on unless a Parra player regains possesion? I can't see it happening.
My understanding is the non offending team gets the benefit of the best result.
I believe If the team that knocks it on touches the ball the play is dead. There is another rule book that states if it is knocked on and goes out either dead ball line or sideline it is a scrum from the knock on.
That's what i would of thought.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next