Stuart to Face a Ban

Why league great says there is ‘no option’ but to ban Ricky as ugly spray exposes NRL’s big problem 

There are calls for Canberra coach Ricky Stuart to be stood down for the rest of the season with the NRL reportedly conceding fines are “not really working for those serial offenders”.

NRL officials will meet on Monday to decide on a sanction for Stuart after he called Panthers young gun Jaeman Salmon “a weak-gutted dog” in his post-match press conference on Saturday.

Stuart apologised for the outburst on Sunday, while the Salmon family have called on the NRL to act.

The NRL are considering slapping Stuart with a ban, with journalist Dave Riccio revealing they have conceded fines aren’t working for serial offenders.

“The NRL they will meet today, there is a commission meeting,” Riccio said on SEN.

“This item was never on the agenda however it will be discussed today, the NRL will determine what sanction they hand down to Ricky Stuart.

“This is an interesting one as there’s been plenty of discussion and consideration from the NRL to suspend Ricky Stuart for a match or more.

“I can tell you this is a path the NRL have been looking at going down for coaches who have serial fines against them for comments made post-match.

 

 

 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Tear up his contract...fark pricky

    • But I will miss his press conferences!!

      • Lol pricky never coaching again is good for the game

        • One Raider's fan  posted on their site that the Raiders club should receive the harshest possible punishment.  Their suggested punishment was being forced th extend Ricky's coaching stint by 5 years.  

          I thought it very funny!

          • lol funny comment

  • https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-2022-ricky-stu...

    Is there any pundits in the game that will make Ricky Stuart accountable.  What a weak as piss group of nuffs or so called journalists that report on the game.

    Someone needs to speak out

    We’re not living in China. Calls to ban Ricky for the season are way over the top — Blog with Hoops
    We’re not living in China. Calls to ban Ricky for the season are BS — Blog with Hoops
    • Article written by the same guy that bullied his workmate on the radio until he quit.

      Same guy that thinks ricky just needs a fine and that will teach him but was fined so many times for drink driving they eventually had to suspend his license just like they need to suspend ricky

  • Good. Stuart is a bully, and bullies only cower to superior force. 

  • I know what he said is out of line. But at the same time, the NRL force the coaches to do these pressers not long after the game. They are emotionally invested so they can often say stuff they regret later. How often when I'm pissed off not send an email till the following day, and hit backspace on practically everything I've said when I've calmed down.

    I'm not a fan of Ricky but at the same time, he does have the balls to say some things that others will only think and not say. If you are going to insist on pressers, then at least allow them time to calm down. Or allow them to opt out for someone else to do it.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • ..and do an incredible injustice to the book,  that's low! 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Axel, once can only make guesses what the point of ABC article was, but it's clearly a product of some backgrounding (source that rejects attribution). Maybe there is an effort to get the Eels to rescind their court motion, via the court of public…"
2 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Poppa, point to what in my post unpacking the ABC article signals AI content. PS: not only am I radically opposed to using ChatGPT, I would also suggest you can't point to any 'marker' and, even worse, could not spot the counter-markers. Note if you…"
9 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"You can appeal a Supreme Court ruling, typically by taking the case to a higher court such as the Court of Appeal (a division of the Supreme Court) or the High Court of Australia. Appeals generally require demonstrating an error of law, new…"
41 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
""The purpose of the article was to be an article"
I know Daz is a professor and subtle as a sledge hammer but even that statement would make him think he has backed the wrong Donkey! LOL
PS I missed the media training and Axel noticed the subtlties…"
1 hour ago
More…