Let's not forget Sivo was in the papers for about 3 weeks running prior to this for similar offences. He'd been given a fair bit of leeway on previous offences. To be fair and unbiased , he was due for a suspension. 4 weeks was plenty harsh and he was certainly treated unfairly with the length of time he copped , but he had been asking for it.
Gaz Nelson > Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/HimAugust 7, 2023 at 10:49pm
Personally I've no interest in fair and unbiased Wiz
Sivo was done because of his loading he had previous recent history using arms to the head.
See the Luai thing for me like the Nathan Brown head shot once you leave your feet your out of control here in lies the inconsistency and even with all the technology they still can't quantify what is a direct headshot and what a dictable punishment is.
For me it's real simple eliminate all head contact out of the game I mean everything.Eliminate grading of head contact treat it as all the same any head contact your off.Eliminate grey areas treat it all the same.Result regardless and you watch how much defense changes.
Luai's feet left the ground - no control. Like they said with Nathan Browns send off. I think Luai should have been bummed for ten and been given 2-3 week's suspension. I don't know how he got off x
"It's actually disgusting.
Who the hell do these clowns support? The Eels or an individual coach who honestly is only in it for him and his family, because from where I sit I see supporters who WOULD DIE for this coach.
Never seen such devotion."
"That's the thing, if he was even close to balanced that site might have a future even if BA gets punted.
The way they carry on,bas soon as BA is boned and they lose access to the Eels training etc, that site may cease to exist."
"Falling into the pattern of whoever we play tend to lose the following week.
Only Penrith and Raiders (golden point over Titans) have won the week after playing us.
Why is it so ....FIIK!!"
Replies
Let's not forget Sivo was in the papers for about 3 weeks running prior to this for similar offences. He'd been given a fair bit of leeway on previous offences. To be fair and unbiased , he was due for a suspension. 4 weeks was plenty harsh and he was certainly treated unfairly with the length of time he copped , but he had been asking for it.
Personally I've no interest in fair and unbiased Wiz
😂
Sivo was done because of his loading he had previous recent history using arms to the head.
See the Luai thing for me like the Nathan Brown head shot once you leave your feet your out of control here in lies the inconsistency and even with all the technology they still can't quantify what is a direct headshot and what a dictable punishment is.
For me it's real simple eliminate all head contact out of the game I mean everything.Eliminate grading of head contact treat it as all the same any head contact your off.Eliminate grey areas treat it all the same.Result regardless and you watch how much defense changes.
shouldve been a sin bin and same charge as sivos hit. however the 4 weeks was due to sivos 3rd offence. im not sure how many offences luai is up to
At least Sivo was trying to wrap his arm, Luai was a straight shoulder with arm tucked.
Luai's feet left the ground - no control. Like they said with Nathan Browns send off. I think Luai should have been bummed for ten and been given 2-3 week's suspension. I don't know how he got off x
The Luai one was by far the worst tackle of the round. How that didn't get a month off is beyond me
Yeah total BS where's the consistency NRL!!
There isn't any