Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club

Returning like the bad smell he is, Roy Spagnolo is once again attempting to undermine the club.

His latest attempt involves 4 Special Resolutions tabled at the upcoming AGM to undo many of the positive governance changes resulting from the ILGA investigation.

If it were up to Roy, online voting would be removed, disenfranchising thousands of eligible members, while strong board member governance requirements would be loosened.

Once again, the fate of the club is left to the voting members to decide.

The AGM is open now to have your say.

The board has tabled its position on the matter. It vehemently opposes the Special Resolutions.

If you are an eligible voting member of the Parramatta Leagues Club, you can vote now. An invitation should be in your emails.

Full AGM details are available here: https://www.parraleagues.com.au/agm2026/

Vote NO to the 4 Special Resolutions and help to protect the club from this small cabal of members who would prefer they reign over the ashes of a fiefdom, rather than the long term benefits a strong Leagues Club provides.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Super I got an email from the Leagues Club saying that voting was open, however I haven't recieved any email with the voting portal link. Any idea when that will be sent?

    Also, apparently the names of members who petitioned for the special resolutions is available but I couldn't seem to find it.

    • It's in that same email, just scroll down and you'll have the link with your voting pin. List of petitioning members is here: https://www.parraleagues.com.au/wp-content/uploads/List-of-Petition...

      Spags and Libertini are both on there.

       

      • The usual suspects. They need to get a hobby.

        I may be going crazy as I can't see any link to vote in that email.
        I see 2 links - AGM page, Pitt-town Amalgamation page.

        • Email was sent yesterday. Should be from Parramatta Leagues Club Ltd, not Parramatta Leagues Directors.

          • Got it. Thanks mate. 

  • i wish i could vote, only joined this year sadly. the sooner these people are gone the better, im an regional eels fan so these changes would remove any hope i have with being involved at this level into the future. i therefore hope that you people who can vote go in and vote no! 

    the club is doing things so right atm with everything, id hate for the club to go back to the dark days of a few years ago. 

  • Fans shouldn't be complacent with this vote.  We know Spaggs will have all his relatives any anyone he can muster to participate.  

  • wondering how he still is able to table proposals. As a part of the 2016 penalties and fines, how is he allowed anywhere near the club still.

    its crazy .....Roy dont let the door hit you on the way out ffs

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Clintorian, I wonder what would happen if it was the Roosters in the Eels' shoes? We would probably. be seeing articles about how professional are the Rorters in defending their interests!"
4 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Axel, once can only make guesses what the point of ABC article was, but it's clearly a product of some backgrounding (source that rejects attribution). Maybe there is an effort to get the Eels to rescind their court motion, via the court of public…"
6 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Poppa, point to what in my post unpacking the ABC article signals AI content. PS: not only am I radically opposed to using ChatGPT, I would also suggest you can't point to any 'marker' and, even worse, could not spot the counter-markers. Note if you…"
13 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"You can appeal a Supreme Court ruling, typically by taking the case to a higher court such as the Court of Appeal (a division of the Supreme Court) or the High Court of Australia. Appeals generally require demonstrating an error of law, new…"
45 minutes ago
More…