3442965879?profile=RESIZE_710x

QUESTION: Was this worth a potential penalty try? Clearly the Bulldogs player takes away any chance of Sivo making a proper chance to grab the ball here. Usually this is a penalty in itself so i would assume the referee made a blunder by not taking a 2nd look at the contest!

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • 3442967351?profile=RESIZE_710x

    • wow cheating dog caught in the act! So that’s what sivo  was shaking his head about!

      • You don't miss much there Navy.

        Well done.

         

    • This looked Suss live. Sivo looked for your money he was going to score when the kick was put over. He had an unlucky night. Could have had 3 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • Thanks Poppa, but this situation needed to be brought up at the Press Conference, so when the games come the referees are more aware of this.

  • Exactly, why I put a blog up Dogrefs beat Eels! Its as clear as the sun shines in the sky,that there's corruption within the NRL  and some teams get favours over other teams at the hands of the referees and the judiciary! It will continue until the whole system has an non biased investigation. It's a total joke! However, most people don't want to hear it let alone believe it's possible.

  • Wow, that wasn’t given a second look at all. 

    that Rema Smith was such grublet 

  • I remember calling this out at the game and was shocked nothing came of it.

  • Yeah Sivo was blowing up about it and apparently he doesn't even know the rules yet.

    • Lol . Yes and if he had told the ref we would have been awarded the penalty try Lol . And we fans would have missed out on witnessing the 50?? passes in Parras last set with the clock ticking down . . Did anyone notice poor unfortunate Nathan Brown received the final pass facing back to his goal line then it looked like he was smashed and jumped on no doubt as a get even for his shoulder hit . That’ after 8 ???Bulldogs attacked him just before he was sin binnned . Not Nathan’s nite !!! 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Zip zip replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"None of us are lawyers. From what it reads, it's a massive deterrent for anyone thinking of R360. Let's be honest, this R360 is doing nothing for grass roots rugby development. It's all about lining the pockets of the backers. I am actually…"
5 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"They don't want players breaking contracts mid contract, but the NRL is fine with clubs offloading players mid contract. "
13 minutes ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to EA's discussion Bailey Simonsson To Remain At The Eels
"How bout now?"
24 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion NRL THREATEN 10-YEAR BAN FOR R360 DEFECTORS
"The NRL will come out of this looking stupid. When roosters or broncos decide they want a player, the loopholes will be exposed.  They are already talking up Mark Nawaqanitawase going back to rugby for a year or 2 and returning to NRL so why should…"
25 minutes ago
More…