Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.

Willie Mason is onto something. The Panthers give away a set restart on the first tackle if they lose the contact. They value getting their line set, and not allowing the opposition any momentum that they're prepared to give away a 6 again on the first tackle. Very clever. 


https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWN9R_FpdnW/?igsh=bzJ6YmZlaHNvNThs

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • We are doing what we should be doing. Exploiting the rules to the letter of the rule. Our players are taking up a position early and abiding by the contesting rules by raising their arms. I'd love to hear a referee try to justify a penalty in this situation.

      • Even if they don't raise their arms I don't think it's a penalty because as you said they get into position very early 

    • I swear on these sites we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. If we don't exploit the rules we are behind the rest of the power house clubs, shit coaching staff, we abuse the rules like Penrith and Melbourne, we are cheats, penalise us.

      • That doesn't sound like us, Gucci.

        The thing with restarts is you can't keep doing it repeatedly — successive restarts, around 3-straight — is a sin bin. 

        Storm almost got a sin bin for doing it against in R1. Alas, they did it at the end of the first half once they built their 18-4 lead. Wait unitl the opposition concedea a restart.  The Game Of Restarts.

    • That's not cheating though again it's just another way to attack the escort rule.

      • At the very least, It's against the spirit of the game. This is what drives me away from the NRL these days (and other pro sports). Everyone always trying to be so clever to get around the rules. No one wants to just play by the rules, as they were intended. No one playing with good intent these days, always an angle to try and get away with something.

        I see it as cheating. Bending the interpretation of the rules so that "technically", it's not against the rules. Everyone does it, and while it's accepted, they will continue to do so.

        The solution will be to change the rules, and then clubs will go to work to try and get around the new rules, leading to another problem, which requires a rule change. Rinse and repeat.

         

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

John Boyle replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Probably a lot of frustration mate, we finished last year strongly, with another pre-season under our belt a lot of fans were most definately expecting to see further improvement this season which hasn't happened yet.
We have a lot of flaws for a…"
34 minutes ago
Parra-Choker replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"have to say it , never come across so much negativity as on this 1EyedEel , have no read one positive paragraph, i think the eels are  a strong units and that was shown by the comeback in both games when they were 20 points down and fought back to…"
41 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I'd love to know whats really happened with De-Belin.
Guymer was horrendous in the 30 minutes he played last week yet seems to be above De-Belin in the pecking order, something isn't adding up.
De-Belin wasn't setting the world on fire in the first…"
47 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Id say mid table.....our middles are poor and we a couple injuries away from real trouble in the backline.
we really need a rep centre,middle and quality NRL standard 6..
Lomax really fucked us"
47 minutes ago
More…