Replies

    • Direct and forceful contact to the head. How many times is this for Sivo? This isn't the NRL targeting the Eels, this is Sivo once again not learning from his mistakes.

      • Yes, CE your not exactly renowned with what's happening at Parra, let alone anywhere else in the competition.

        • Sometimes as I don't live locally 

      • Yep have to agree 

      • I am a big believer in holding coaches accountable, even when the calls of "Coaches don't drop the ball" come out, i hate those lines.

        But people blaming BA here is unjustified, this is on Sivo going rogue and not realising that a good hit is only as good as the timing involved. Now could say BA should drop him, and i reply for who? Sign another Winger is all well and good but we tried to buy one and didn't as there was nothing there, so if there was not one worth our while, why force a change just to get rid of Sivo.

        His defence is average at best but you let him talk elsewhere, 3-4 teams are on the phone to him in the next hour.

  • Bloody idiot....should have taken someone's head off in the last game last year!!! And it's not guaranteed Bailey plays either, he came off injured yesterday. 
    So here we are again, all off season and the club still couldn't purchase a back. Good Job BA.

    • Exactly, Bailey no guarantee so we are stuck with starting a reserve grader in Harper in the centres and  and have no back up on the wing. It's not like BA didn't see this 18-24 months ago!!!!

    • Cannot understand why they didn't look for some backs but continually focus on forwards. Doesn't make sense 

      • We tried, fox, tupou

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Axel replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"This is basically a FU to VLandy's & Abdo for their support to the Storm. I've no doubt the NRL had a hand in this settlement and wouldn't be surprised if they pay the $250k. Handing over records showing they favoured one club over another wouldn't…"
3 minutes ago
The Badger replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I feel the same way. Excellent effort all round by the club."
3 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"It's over, folks. 
They all knew what the result was going to be without spending a $1m.
An Eels win, restraint upheld, with a read down. 
And lots of dirty laundry for HQ and Storm, banrolling the whole saga, who got more than they bargained for.…"
4 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Hopefully the subpoaened evidence we now have will prevent any retribution from the NRL. We all know they wanted Zac in Melbourne."
6 minutes ago
More…