You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Yep they certainly "could" control outcomes using 6 agains and even just speeding up and down the ruck using verbal commands. There is one thing all humans eventually suffer - fatigue. All nrl teams are capable of taking advantage of it.
Make no…"
Make no…"
"Im not going to sack them based on one game and Rd1 at that , it could very well be the knock back down the Earth that they need after the hype from a good pre season . Sh 1t happens without explanation ..... a horse runs a bad race then comes out…"
"There's no instant gratification fixes happening here we have to grind out improvement and take the rocks along the way Thursday was a set back but hopefully that's out of our system and we can move on.The only time you get a hiding like that is…"
"Because the NRL control the outcome of selected games through the referees and Bunker. It's fairly obvious"
Replies
It's pretty outrageous. How were we meant to stay under the cap with only 15-16 players (that were fully fit to play during a certain part of the year) if their contracts could not be amended and we need 17 to not forfeit a match?
To field the 17 players meant we had to breach the cap intentionally but the NRL has not acknowledged this mitigating factor and still fines us. Yes at other points in time we had the option to put out of form players like Moimoi in but we were fighting for a place in the 8 and so did that mean that we had to play with an inferior squad and just be less competitive? On the one hand the NRL wants the competition to be more competitive and draw in bigger crowds, but on the other hand their administration is not supporting the clubs that are disadvantaged.
It is a fact that we could have controlled the mismanagement, but we couldn't have controlled the injuries and thus fining us AND forcing recommendations upon us is ridiculous.
We could never have a competition without a cap, and I wouldn't advocate it, but there once was a time where being graded meant that you could be called up into first grade at any time. Now you have to have an accounting degree to work out if someone is allowed to play. As fans, we have no idea (but that's a whole new can of worms).
Once again it's all bluff and noise from the NRL. They have no jurisdiction over such matters. The scary part is they haven't even worked that out yet. They are a crap organisation.
To continue on from what Mutt has said: Dave Smith is absolutely the worst CEO the game has had. When asked at a press conference during the week if the salary cap was working properly, his response was, "Yes, there isn't a problem." He is kidding right? Right!!?? Every season we have about 4-6 sides apply for dispensation in their second tier cap because of injuries and suspension. That's a quarter of the teams in the competition, every season having to ask the NRL to allow them to field a team. That would indicate the cap is not working.
I think it was Sharp or Seward who gave the example of Taniela Lasalo last season. We traveled to North Queensland with Lasalo as 19th man. The NRL said we couldn't play him. In the warm-up we had a prop go down injured, Mitchell Allgood, our Top 25 contracted 18th man pulled out due to effects of a concussion and we had to make a decision of either fielding 16 players or break the second tier cap. Lasalo played 4 minutes that game and was counted under the second tier cap. We virtually had no option but to play him. Again, that would indicate the current salary cap system is outdated and cannot work with the current structure of the NRL.
I'll add here, just in case anyone has forgotten, that I have always stayed out of the board and politics discussions. I have no interest and no inside knowledge or anything like that in such matters. But I know, from a detached standpoint, when it's obvious matters have been handled poorly. This systemic cap breaching is one of those times. Honest fans would say their mea culpa's and get on with it.
The club is in the wrong we should accept this and move on.
We should accept the NRL attempting to bully us over mismanagement by previous administration? To accept the threat of a loss of points after we've already instituted structural reform and began constitutional reform? To accept the second largest fine in NRL history after SELF-REPORTING? The NRL is trying to gain control of enough clubs to stave any attempt at another Super League style war. A lot of clubs, Parramatta included, are beginning to get jack of the way the game is being run and now I understand why.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next