Scrums

Is anyone else surprised that teams are having such success packing attacking scrums from the middle of the field and our tactical genius coach has wingers feeding the scrum 10m in from touch?

Middle seemed like the logical choice as the fullback can float around late and worst case you have 3 on 3 both sides . I watched us pack it wide in the trial against souths and it was ineffective , wide in the trial against Penrith it was ineffective and round 1 it was ineffective . Meanwhile teams are getting so strained by the middle scrum they're breaking early to stop it . No one is ever going to accuse BA of being a smart coach . He's a good man manager though. 

The move probably works at training because he has forwards defending the width of the field and thought it'd be the way to go. Dear oh dear . 15 of 16 teams knew what to do. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • You were encouraged by that round 1 win? It was a replay of the game we played them last year but we snuck in this time. We didn't show we'd learnt much in the last 6 months nor have we the last 6 years. ,You're right in saying it's only round 1 though and we can change.

  • maybe he thought.....no hear me out...maybe he thought the other coaches would be like "well nobody would be stupid enough to pack it from out wide" so they did all there prep on scrums ftom the middle then  FCKN BAM!!! BA packs it from out wide.See?Genius. Now apologize. 

    • I think it may have been that and that they did not plan to throw it out wide to a wing and risk drpping it or being pushed into touch on tackle one

      • Maybe Bradley wanted to have two Browns and two Blakes on the one side of the field. 

  • The Storm were feeding theirs from the hash marks last night. Craig Bellamy is such a bush coach. 

  • I mean, you're trying really hard to find stuff to whinge about if you're complaining about this. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Nothing on Foxsport yet. Mmm."
1 minute ago
Phillip replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"What absolute grubs the Storm are and the NRL for letting them get away with it.  Im sure all fans from other clubs are right behind Parramatta and their stance and even more so if we win the court case "
1 minute ago
Prof. Daz replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Let's not forget the NRL just enacted new anti-tampering rules, effective 1 February. They're specifically designed to prohibit direct and indirect inducement when a player is not yet free to negotiate. In Lomax's case, he was feee to negotiate but…"
5 minutes ago
MeelK replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yes and let's not forget Matt Tripps business background..."
6 minutes ago
More…