Weird move , the only reasons I could think of for such a move are all negitive . It's certainly not due to sterling performance. It screams inexperienced management panicking.
Maybe Ryles manager Mimis has promised to deliver us a star recruit like Sloan if we extend Ryles lol.
I swear this club spends its days looking for ways to make us more pathetic for longer periods. They're easily fucking impressed that's for sure. MON is their expert adviser and Ryles ducks and weaves two spoons and gets an extension.
Pretty odd for this to happen prior to a new CEO being named. Once a sitting CEO resigns all big strategic decisions should wait for the new CEO ideally.
Ryles contract isn't up, so why rush a renewal before the new boss is appointed to assess the decision.
Super, super odd. Especially given our season was a further regression.
Great post Cap. Some good points that i didn't think of. You're spot on that why not wait for new CEO to be hired beforehand. The idea should be the CEO has as much in it's control as possible, not great if they have a coach you didn't hire signed for 4 more years.
There was no need to sign him now. Only time you need to sign a coach, in my opinion, is before they enter the last year of their deal. Ryles has two years of his original deal left. This is very Wests Tigers esque from Parramatta. Trying to smother the noise by going over the top.
Unless the talk of Ryles and Rush's connection being true, therefore Rush doesn't have an issue extending Ryles? That is me clutching at some sort of straws there are.
"Again, i could be wrong, but if Smith was to be that Lock role i reckon Ryles would have trialled him late in the year.
Does Koina need a full season in Cup? He might but i hear that a lot about a player and not always the case. Tuivaiti and Smith…"
"We do want to recruit backs. Best, Bostock, Howarth even Talagi would be on their list and many more. Getting them is another story.
Though Talagi tearing his achilles makes it slightly harder as he would have been a target for Centre in 2027. A…"
"Great post Cap. Some good points that i didn't think of. You're spot on that why not wait for new CEO to be hired beforehand. The idea should be the CEO has as much in it's control as possible, not great if they have a coach you didn't hire signed…"
Replies
I'd rather we wait until the second half of 2027, but I won't be too bothered I've seen enough to be hopeful for sure.
Weird move , the only reasons I could think of for such a move are all negitive . It's certainly not due to sterling performance. It screams inexperienced management panicking.
Maybe Ryles manager Mimis has promised to deliver us a star recruit like Sloan if we extend Ryles lol.
I swear this club spends its days looking for ways to make us more pathetic for longer periods. They're easily fucking impressed that's for sure. MON is their expert adviser and Ryles ducks and weaves two spoons and gets an extension.
Pretty odd for this to happen prior to a new CEO being named. Once a sitting CEO resigns all big strategic decisions should wait for the new CEO ideally.
Ryles contract isn't up, so why rush a renewal before the new boss is appointed to assess the decision.
Super, super odd. Especially given our season was a further regression.
Great post Cap. Some good points that i didn't think of. You're spot on that why not wait for new CEO to be hired beforehand. The idea should be the CEO has as much in it's control as possible, not great if they have a coach you didn't hire signed for 4 more years.
There was no need to sign him now. Only time you need to sign a coach, in my opinion, is before they enter the last year of their deal. Ryles has two years of his original deal left. This is very Wests Tigers esque from Parramatta. Trying to smother the noise by going over the top.
Unless the talk of Ryles and Rush's connection being true, therefore Rush doesn't have an issue extending Ryles? That is me clutching at some sort of straws there are.
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 6 Next