Ryles confirms Pezet play

Michael Chammas is reporting, though not final, the deal is close. The reason for the deal is they only want Pezet for one year max to not block the path of their talent of the future. https://www.zerotackle.com/munster-reveals-contract-intention-ryles-confirms-pezet-play-228340/

 

Well it is hard as Joash more likely plays Fullback in Cup and with Hawkins and Volkman more likely the halves in Cup, where does Talataina get reps other than Flegg? Still do not agree with it but Ryles has a plan and all we can do is hope for the best. It is very weird but i wonder, just wonder if there is more to it here where we have a Brisbane player on our mind and this is a type of you can have him if you do this. 

Not saying It is the case, tin foil hat theory.

But Ryles has a plan behind it, not saying i think it makes sense but let's see how it goes.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Paps and pezet has played the same amount of nrl games. Pezet more in the halves. Paps was improving game on game. Who's to say pezet won't be a flop. I think we got a bargin deal. We all know buckets likes shopping for the red light specials. 

    • The thing that Pezet can offer is the kicking game so Moses doesn't have to do 99.9% of that and wear himself out next year. Yes its a 1 year stop gap but this team should push for finals and the young players on the squad should gain finals experience. Lorenzo and Joash have plenty of time to stake their claim on a 6 jersey it's not going anywhere in 2027. This is why Ryles gets paid the big money to make calls and we as fans look on and try figure out what is going lol 

  • The biggest winner in all this is the Broncos. Biggest loser is Joash. Hawkins of to super league. Our 2 juniors are at least 2 years away from first grade. And what's Pezet on.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"I don't understand your argument hkf.  Also Chammas stated something about the club not wanting him for longer, who says that statement came from Ryles or the club - it didn't simply "
10 seconds ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Dean Hawkins to depart Eels
"Oh that must be Zero Tackle targets for 2027. Nothing confirmed it is just a series of articles they do every year of who they think clubs should target for November 1."
35 seconds ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"Don't forget any player can say they are sick of any club at anytime now and demand an exit. There is no such thing as long term contracts anymore. "
4 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"Whys that?  Ryles has already fixed up many of Brad's fuck ups, mate he's doing a great job.   The Dylan Brown situation farked us massively another part brad arthur stuff up.  
Ryles is running things now hkf,  its just the previous decisions made…"
4 minutes ago
More…