Ryles confirms Pezet play

Michael Chammas is reporting, though not final, the deal is close. The reason for the deal is they only want Pezet for one year max to not block the path of their talent of the future. https://www.zerotackle.com/munster-reveals-contract-intention-ryles-confirms-pezet-play-228340/

 

Well it is hard as Joash more likely plays Fullback in Cup and with Hawkins and Volkman more likely the halves in Cup, where does Talataina get reps other than Flegg? Still do not agree with it but Ryles has a plan and all we can do is hope for the best. It is very weird but i wonder, just wonder if there is more to it here where we have a Brisbane player on our mind and this is a type of you can have him if you do this. 

Not saying It is the case, tin foil hat theory.

But Ryles has a plan behind it, not saying i think it makes sense but let's see how it goes.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Paps and pezet has played the same amount of nrl games. Pezet more in the halves. Paps was improving game on game. Who's to say pezet won't be a flop. I think we got a bargin deal. We all know buckets likes shopping for the red light specials. 

    • The thing that Pezet can offer is the kicking game so Moses doesn't have to do 99.9% of that and wear himself out next year. Yes its a 1 year stop gap but this team should push for finals and the young players on the squad should gain finals experience. Lorenzo and Joash have plenty of time to stake their claim on a 6 jersey it's not going anywhere in 2027. This is why Ryles gets paid the big money to make calls and we as fans look on and try figure out what is going lol 

  • The biggest winner in all this is the Broncos. Biggest loser is Joash. Hawkins of to super league. Our 2 juniors are at least 2 years away from first grade. And what's Pezet on.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Eli Stephens replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"Im just not annoyed by a loan deal in any way. 😂 Pezet is here to help the club not hurt it "
26 seconds ago
Slippery. replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?

 Were you in favour of signing him prior to the 1 year story came out? I know many 1 eyed members were very much in favour of signing Pezet. I really can't see how or why Pezet would leave Melbourne to be a reserve grade player elsewhere. Surely…"
3 minutes ago
Sonic Boom replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"It was a punish. He was squirming in his chair trying to think of reasons why it benefits us lol"
3 minutes ago
KN replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"Sneak into top 4, Fuck around and win the comp in 26 lessgooo!!!
Agree with the Anasta podcast, we wanted a longer deal and he chose broncos. Bit of a slap in the face and we look like cucks.
If we wanted a longer deal then why is the club now…"
4 minutes ago
More…