Time to unleash the Fox!
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"So why have 5 and a replacement just have 6 it's simple "
"Carlo, my daughter and I are 1.5 seasons away from the ST finale. No spoilers! An entrancing little series. Episodes also long enough to flesh out characters and plot elements. The Kid has also become a Kate Bush fan and is on the synthesizer…"
"I don't watch it , but heard my son and all his mates whining about them just having to add in a gay angle to it for no reason. It's good to see the kids are totally aware that Netflix has an agenda to force this rubbish into their heads. I…"
"Replacements makes sense. I don't think you even need 6, it is something that can work though at the same time. 5 could do with an extra replacement.
But I understand as 18 and 19 more times than most would be a Half and a back."
But I understand as 18 and 19 more times than most would be a Half and a back."
Replies
Fingers crossed Hawkins is better than he looked last week in Reggie's. He didn't look like a bloke sufficient for the NRL. Maybe just settling in to a new club. I still hold reservations considering Bennett didn't offer him a contract and went for the young kid from Manly and Sullivan.
Tigers were so much faster than us out wide. Jac brings some much needed speed. Between penisi, samrani and russell we had a very slow backline
Agree Jiver, get Simmo on the other wing when he is fit
Good to see JAC come in
I'm glad Samrani kept his spot and Russell got the boot.
Hands is average but Lussick is just absolute shit. Not sure what Kearney 2.0 is thinking about here.
Probably wants some line speed in the first 20m. I dont really mind it because smith will be on for 60 minutes
I like it, ryles is showing back to back below expectations performances won't be acceptable, hands has been poor at best.
He has been poor at best but even his poor games are better than 90% of Lussick's games.
You can't keep rewarding players that aren't performing, this is what BA was doing, it promotes complacency.
I understand that but replacing poor with utter crap is just as bad.
I don't remember lussick being as bad as hands has been the first two games. He isn't as good but I don't think his floor is as low as hands.
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 6 Next