Replies

      • Yea true but I don't think Lussick will make a difference

        • He is a different style Hooker than Hands but Hands is more steady. But as you say better off just starting Smith as the starting Hooker gets 20 min spell and thats it.

        • Hands has not been good at all and I think its the right move to start lussick,  smith isn't an 80 min player at this level yet.

          There seems to be a clear message from ryles, he is going to priorities youth over experience if the experience isn't performing.  The fact that Russell made way for addo Carr and not samrani indicates this, not that Russell was playing bad but we know what his ceiling is and that's a back up player at best.

          • This reply was deleted.
            • Are you always a fuckwit or just when you post on here you dumb cunt

  • Can't honestly see JAC making that much difference. Really need some good signings. Lane, Offa, Lussick all below average as is Paulo, Brown is too busy counting down the year and the $$ and has his mind elsewhere. Very average side. Really need a few X Factor, mongrel type players to make any dent in this year's premiership. Could take at least 2 years or longer to turn all this around 

    • Eels 13 plus

    • JAC should make a huge difference. Russell and Penisini together are a massive liability 

  • Fox wont win it for us. But last week if we scored from one of the many opportunities in the first half it could have been a different game. Interested to see how hawkins goes and at least we know the fox can finish

    • Fingers crossed Hawkins is better than he looked last week in Reggie's. He didn't look like a bloke sufficient for the NRL. Maybe just settling in to a new club. I still hold reservations considering Bennett didn't offer him a contract and went for the young kid from Manly and Sullivan. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Blue Eel do you think that contract could be just thrown out if we win at court  though? Is it always regarded, or does it remain legally valid between the two Lomax and Storm?   might be a silly question as I don't know about that side of  stuff at…"
3 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"This now has to be the end to the NRL club hierarchy. Fans have known about this since the start of the NRL and are frankly sick of it. Time for equal opportunity between clubs, or the NRL will slowly die. It makes a mockery of the competition,…"
6 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Yep it's the whistleblowers !!!
but mb there was no one brave enough in this instance and we had to have legal proceedings for something to be uncovered by legal minds in the process of uncovering evidence 
I guess the result is the same except we…"
8 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Tripp has to go for gimping Abdo too"
12 minutes ago
More…