Round 19 Team List v Broncos

1. Gutherson

2. Sivo

3. M Jennings

4. Blake

5. Ferguson

6. Field

7. Moses

8. Campbell-Gillard

9. Mahoney

10. Paulo

11. Matterson

12. Lane

13. N Brown

 

Interchange:

 

14. Smith

15. Davey  

16. Evans 

17. Kaufusi

 

Reserves:

 

18. Dunster 

19. Utoikamanu 

20. G Jennings 

21. Alvaro

 

IN: Mahoney

OUT: Stone

 

Referee: TBA

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

            • Yes you are definitely right. Why can't Brad see that. 

            • No one's playing reggies, so it's hard to bring blokes in I guess

  • Defensively we need to watch out for Deardon's show and go because he loves to run the ball. Then we also have to watch out for Staggs and Fifita who are too powerhouses. Fifita will be running at Moses all night so Moses has to be on defensively and then also help score alot of points to give the team confidence come finals time. Staggs will be marked by Jennings who is thankfully one of the best defensive centres in the competition. However, if Staggs gets isolated on Sivo, there will be a linebreak given Sivo's defensive flaws. I wouldn't of mind if Staggs was up against Blake and Fergo just because they needs more practice (espically Blake) before finals because those teams have strike all over the park so Blake will need to be defensively on or get his pants pulled down. 

  • would like alvaro over evans atm 

  • 7929213465?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • Good to see we are friendless in the betting.

      This is when Parra are at their most dangerous- under dogs.

      • Lol. We don't do well with expectations. The most pleasing thing about the ladder is seeing tigers in 9th position. I can't believe I didn't put money on that. lol. 

        • The ninth placed specialists lol

      • Those are fantastic odds for a team likely to finish 4th. Don't think you will see that for a long time.

         

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
5 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
8 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
8 hours ago
More…