Round 13 games

The Warriors showing the cheat code to attack Manly. Basically keep going to Suli for 3-4 tackles, bunch Manly up as they try to protect him, then spread a couple wide passes to their left and Bob's your uncle. Two easy-peasy tries for the Warriors following that strategy.

PS George Jennings despite a try, up to his old "out of position" or "missing tackles" best. I'd pay never to see him at Parra again.

PPS BA should make a raid for Jack Hetherington. After all the Panthers are our player development club :P

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

              • The kicking player has always been abe to run players onside.

                Not a problem unless you do not understand the game and the rules.

                • Sir Col, imagine an extreme downtown scenario. Attacking player runs ahead and puts himself 11m from the kick receiver. Within 10 is automatically offside. Kicker chases through and gets to the kick receiver who has ran 1m and the downtown player moves in to the tackle. Is the downtown player offside?

                  • You must be a brilliant academic Prof - the higher the acedemic ability the LESS likelyhood of having any common sense.

                    Under the rules you have described a legal situation.

                    That was academic fukwittery at its best son.

                    • Sir Col I'm not sure that response is called for. It was a fair question. Politely asked. 

                      Here is another. Two attackers run through on a kick, A is offside and B is not. B challenges for the ball but A gets the rebound and scores. That would be called back for B being offside, I suspect. There are more conditions on the "active offside player" being put onside than what their onside team-mate does. I was asking about those conditions.

                      I'll leave it up to you to decide who is being a fuckwit in this exchange. But we both know who ditched civility.
                      Hope you're doing well. 

                    • Poppa, bit of a double-standard, then? I've gotta be well behaved lest I'm arrogant, others get cart blanche?!

                      Oh whatever, if I had a dollar for every time someone said academic and common sense sit in an inverse relationship, I'd be a millionaire. Yawn, why is common sense so often reduced to refusing to think anything through respectfully and reasonably?!

                    • Don't worry Daz, you don't intimidate me - I reckon you're just a big teddy bear :)

                      2882778449?profile=RESIZE_400x

                    • Oh Kram, thanks mate. You know you want a cuddle. Mwa!

                    • I see you as Gough Whitlam not a teddy bear 👍

                    • https://youtu.be/vqMCZBjvmD4

                    • Only an academic would get sensitivilitly offended for being called out on a ridiculous comment Prof.

                      You described a perfectly legal situation them wanted me to defend myself>

                      That my friend is Academic Fukwittery and I called you on it.

                      Do you lecture your students on the old theory that you can never fully close a door as well?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"I've never agreed with the term "swap" being used in this saga. There is no swap. Lomax isn't an employee of ours. Not sure why the nrl want to involve themselves in this, or the players association for that matter. It's an agreement between us and…"
11 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Best example I can think of is if a player tears an acl then the club rips up his 4 year contract 🤣 unfortunate situations happen but you've signed the damn contract "
16 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"It's just not the right way to do things is it. I have no idea what the final outcome of this will be, as I said before likely that Lomax pays some sort of compensation and it's done - not ideal from our perspective but that's life."
17 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Does anyone remember this?
"Only difference here is that JAC was actually playing so NRL had no interest in getting him back into the game. 
Not sure why they're so interested in this 1 guy who is most likely going to go to R360 if/when  it actually starts."
19 minutes ago
More…