rape allegation

news circulating that a player has been accused of rape, from a queensalnd club, does anyone know anything about this? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Shouldn't be too hard to figure out who, if the charge carries an 11 year prison term then the nrl needs to stand them down.

    • it is swept well and truly . Nothing happened.

  • Dolphins player, initials JW allegedly

  • Wonder how the NRL will handle this? NRL should stand him down pending court case etc. However, QLD law is that the alleged rapist cannot be named until the court case is held.

    If NRL stands down X then does that contravene QLD law?

    Perhaps, one of our lawyers can answer that one.

    • If he's charged,  he won't be able to play under the nrls stand down rules. Doesn't mean they have to name him. 

      • Am I too much of a Scully or is this why someone pulled out suddenly of a deal w a nsw club and stayed w a qld one 🤔

        • It's not Fifita.

          • Someone calls for a lawyer and Chief turns up, that's the equivalent of offering himself for a moon mission, not realising that the dog, monkey and a chimpanzee all in the same queue had higher IQ's.

            • You're out of ammunition ploppa. Since your recent back flipper posts on your old mates O'neill + Arthur, you've lost all of your credibility amongst everyone except the rock and his flipping dolphin mate, and even they have gone AWOL. Lol poor flipping kent ,  what a crying shame 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

              https://youtu.be/W-hV9QbCeZM?si=_fsBGvBaVQ7LoVMZ

               

            • Might be an opportunity for some cheap shelf content Ploppa .  Have you inboxed every rep player at the Dolphins yet hoping their impending legal costs will force them to sell their treasured family items ? 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
16 minutes ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
1 hour ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
1 hour ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yep, but fuck I hope not. The Nrl should be on parras side here"
1 hour ago
More…