Seems like this R360 could be a load of crap
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"10 years ago."
"That's an interesting question, and i've read what most people think should happen, about returning. I think we are forgetting what has caused this issue in the first place. I don't think Lomax was a happy camper, i don't know if the word mental…"
"Adam, Hopefully, we can build on the improvement we showed over the year, especially the last two months.
0/4 (0%): Horrid start. 5/13 (40%): Slow growth. 5/7 (71%): Positive signs.
Many here might not have faith in Ryles or the club, but they…"
0/4 (0%): Horrid start. 5/13 (40%): Slow growth. 5/7 (71%): Positive signs.
Many here might not have faith in Ryles or the club, but they…"
"Thanks, Randy. I managed to touch base briefly with TAD yesterday, and he's doing okay. I do miss him on here. "
Replies
Yeah, you're right. PM...and there is a chance (moses foot anyone?) that it works out really well for us...but we are a damaged fan base and we expect the worst...that someone or everyone fucked up...and while we wait for the worst to occur, as it obviously will, we sling shit and domscroll and wail like middle-eastern women
Learning through repetition is super effective...so here we are
The brightside is that we are not Tigpies fans that havent even played finals since 2011.
and that we are not Dogs fans...because Dogs fans fucking suck
Coryn, I’m probably too old to join you in the kiddie pool of gutter-trash talk.
The idea “Parra First” means never signing a short-termer? Or you “can’t develop players" if they leave? That’s a Walt Disney movie script.
And the player-options meltdown? You talk about them like they’re the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. The club binned that stuff right months after the ’22 GF: no contracts with POs were issued after that. We have none at now.
Essentially, all clubs use POs or have used them outside say the Dogs and Panthers. And now us. We have also drawn a firm line on them. It's yet another nuanced "reality" you overlook like some other ideas.
Anyway, keep lecturing others about not moving on from BA (2024) while you’re still yelling at contract clauses.
I'm not fussed either way but if doesn't come back we need to sign another experienced outside back, we have zero depth with proven first grade experience.
They just signed a guy whose doing exactly the samething using us as a stepping stone for something better.They know about that deal all along.There's not that different with Lomax it cost him a chunk of cash to get out early he's paid that.
What I'm not liking is we don't have any sought of long term replacement of the talent that's going out the door that's the concern I've been echoing and with the club in a rebuild phase we aren't strong enough talent wise to lose players of the caliber of Brown or Lomax that's the concern.
Me I put all the BS narratives aside and look at what we have and just put it in simple terms ok Browns gone are we a better side with Lomax in it or without him if the answer is the first get a deal done and let's get on with the rebuild.
not actually overcharged with genious's....,well you just proved that Poppo, Lol
Thanks for confirming that Randolph!
genius
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
of 16 Next