Quiet here tonight

What's the matter with you lot????

jake Arthur plays well and you all shut the F**k up. 
Hahahahaha

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No we are on the match blog congratulating the man.

  • He played well and it was appropriate to play him. But do not get carried away he is a backup half at best at the moment 

    • That's all he's ever been. A stop gap that people expected to play like Cameron Munster .

    • Not getting carried away at all. 
      he's a fill in at the moment, everyone knows that. 
      but doesn't deserved to be booed 

      • Well said Mac

  • Of course, the kid played to the 1st half plan, then he open up... great game by the kid but next week another challenge. But to point out his faults goes to show the hate because other players also f&$ked up. But as a team, 7/10 & that's a pass. 

  • Quiet? im still here, the kid did 2 good things, the rest of the time he was hiding from defending and walking around blowing in backplay, i thought he had a very poor first half which was redeeemed by a good pass and kick.

    Youre talking like the kids the next sterling lol

    The gushing from Joey tonight was predictable, hes always good for it.

    I think Jakes one of the worst young halves ive ever seen play top grade.

    • He wasnt great and he wasnt terrible. Lets just give it all a break tonight and enjoy the win.

      The kid is 19 and he doesnt deserve what he cops. 

      • Oneeyed snake can't help himself, he is just a miserable cnut. 

    • Defensively he was pretty good. He doesn't offer much with the running game but he can play eyes up footy and has a nice short kick . I still reckon he ends up a ball playing edge backrower 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Is every club depending on who you ask."
10 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"So you're willing to give Melbourne a gold chip just so we can take a bronze chip. That's not smart, that is dumber than dog shit"
1 hour ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"You've also got to remember Lomax might be more than willing to pay us say $500k in damages (I'm not sure what would be agreed to by the parties or court enforced) in order to get a 3 year $700k contract with the storm."
3 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"We don't need to pick any sort of fight in this, we don't need to be the aggressor. It is also important that we don't portray ourselves as that.
At this stage there has been no wrong (I think the correct term is "tort") committed. Time is on our…"
3 hours ago
More…