Quiet here tonight

What's the matter with you lot????

jake Arthur plays well and you all shut the F**k up. 
Hahahahaha

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No we are on the match blog congratulating the man.

  • He played well and it was appropriate to play him. But do not get carried away he is a backup half at best at the moment 

    • That's all he's ever been. A stop gap that people expected to play like Cameron Munster .

    • Not getting carried away at all. 
      he's a fill in at the moment, everyone knows that. 
      but doesn't deserved to be booed 

      • Well said Mac

  • Of course, the kid played to the 1st half plan, then he open up... great game by the kid but next week another challenge. But to point out his faults goes to show the hate because other players also f&$ked up. But as a team, 7/10 & that's a pass. 

  • Quiet? im still here, the kid did 2 good things, the rest of the time he was hiding from defending and walking around blowing in backplay, i thought he had a very poor first half which was redeeemed by a good pass and kick.

    Youre talking like the kids the next sterling lol

    The gushing from Joey tonight was predictable, hes always good for it.

    I think Jakes one of the worst young halves ive ever seen play top grade.

    • He wasnt great and he wasnt terrible. Lets just give it all a break tonight and enjoy the win.

      The kid is 19 and he doesnt deserve what he cops. 

      • Oneeyed snake can't help himself, he is just a miserable cnut. 

    • Defensively he was pretty good. He doesn't offer much with the running game but he can play eyes up footy and has a nice short kick . I still reckon he ends up a ball playing edge backrower 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good stuff gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Still, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still win,…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
7 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
8 hours ago
More…