Quiet here tonight

What's the matter with you lot????

jake Arthur plays well and you all shut the F**k up. 
Hahahahaha

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No we are on the match blog congratulating the man.

  • He played well and it was appropriate to play him. But do not get carried away he is a backup half at best at the moment 

    • That's all he's ever been. A stop gap that people expected to play like Cameron Munster .

    • Not getting carried away at all. 
      he's a fill in at the moment, everyone knows that. 
      but doesn't deserved to be booed 

      • Well said Mac

  • Of course, the kid played to the 1st half plan, then he open up... great game by the kid but next week another challenge. But to point out his faults goes to show the hate because other players also f&$ked up. But as a team, 7/10 & that's a pass. 

  • Quiet? im still here, the kid did 2 good things, the rest of the time he was hiding from defending and walking around blowing in backplay, i thought he had a very poor first half which was redeeemed by a good pass and kick.

    Youre talking like the kids the next sterling lol

    The gushing from Joey tonight was predictable, hes always good for it.

    I think Jakes one of the worst young halves ive ever seen play top grade.

    • He wasnt great and he wasnt terrible. Lets just give it all a break tonight and enjoy the win.

      The kid is 19 and he doesnt deserve what he cops. 

      • Oneeyed snake can't help himself, he is just a miserable cnut. 

    • Defensively he was pretty good. He doesn't offer much with the running game but he can play eyes up footy and has a nice short kick . I still reckon he ends up a ball playing edge backrower 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
7 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
9 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
9 hours ago
More…