Quiet here tonight

What's the matter with you lot????

jake Arthur plays well and you all shut the F**k up. 
Hahahahaha

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • No we are on the match blog congratulating the man.

  • He played well and it was appropriate to play him. But do not get carried away he is a backup half at best at the moment 

    • That's all he's ever been. A stop gap that people expected to play like Cameron Munster .

    • Not getting carried away at all. 
      he's a fill in at the moment, everyone knows that. 
      but doesn't deserved to be booed 

      • Well said Mac

  • Of course, the kid played to the 1st half plan, then he open up... great game by the kid but next week another challenge. But to point out his faults goes to show the hate because other players also f&$ked up. But as a team, 7/10 & that's a pass. 

  • Quiet? im still here, the kid did 2 good things, the rest of the time he was hiding from defending and walking around blowing in backplay, i thought he had a very poor first half which was redeeemed by a good pass and kick.

    Youre talking like the kids the next sterling lol

    The gushing from Joey tonight was predictable, hes always good for it.

    I think Jakes one of the worst young halves ive ever seen play top grade.

    • He wasnt great and he wasnt terrible. Lets just give it all a break tonight and enjoy the win.

      The kid is 19 and he doesnt deserve what he cops. 

      • Oneeyed snake can't help himself, he is just a miserable cnut. 

    • Defensively he was pretty good. He doesn't offer much with the running game but he can play eyes up footy and has a nice short kick . I still reckon he ends up a ball playing edge backrower 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"Though do Melbourne see this as a chance to win in 2026? Bellamy's last year more likely."
33 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Melbourne have everything to do with the release agreement if they've already signed, or taken action to sign Lomax outside the terms of the agreement....exactly, but they would not have done that unless the NRL gave them the thumbs up. We don't…"
33 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"LB, me too.
A swap deal is not impossible. The issue is that while there may be legal leverage, Lomax remains a risky exchange and likely a temporary sugar hit.
If I were another club, I would not want to lose long term quality players for him, as…"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Exactly Yobz! He still signed it after knowing R360 was off table for couple a years too, but RU was there as he agreed and looked into signing up to! It wasn't that he didn't have a chance to play that...just the offer of 450K wasn't enough. Tough,…"
1 hour ago
More…