There's and old but well known biblical standard called "he who is without sin throw the first stone".
Frankly the only sin of JAC was driving a car, but even then, some sort of mitigation could be/is involved.
I have done some research that whilst cocaine supposedly goes through your system in 24 hours, in some cases it can take a few days.i.e very small traces
An example would be lets say in JAC's case, he thought he was ok to drive because he was 24 hours plus when deciding to drive, now we know that many drivers have gone for alcohol when tested up to 24 hours after drinking and actually being perfectly fine to drive, ok a line has to be drawn and cocaine is illegal and alcohol is not....BUT the consequence's of driving intoxicated are mutual.
One thing should be noted here is that Alcohol has a tolerance level .05 and cocaine has none, the degree of error is irrelevant from the system perspective but not when a person's whole career is in jeopardy.
We had a driving incident with Mam from Broncos that was much more serious than JAC's offence.
I would like to think that JAC will get the usual disqualification and fine that applies from a public prosecution. JAC was on holidays and as such the NRL does not need to get involved given that normal public justice prevails. This of course won't happen for the reasons outlined here.
Bringing the game and club into disrepute is an issue that has to be addressed, notwithstanding it is only a minor issue and all recommendations for his health, the club and the game have been identified and acted on, with the exception of meeting a perception. Anyone reading this can create their own perception, I am only interested in the perception of keeping JAC an Eel.
The NRL officially has a drug testing process/programme in place, these tests are done whilst players are in training and before a game. It is interesting to note that no one seemingly gets caught, WHY? because the NRL structure the tests so to avoid catching players out. The last thing the NRL wants is half the competition players out for a drug offence that is used across the whole of society or at least a spectrum of high performance people and athletes.....The Hipocrisy is rabid and the NRL will need to make some example of JAC to be seen in the right light......
Ilongi is a young Parra player, every one knows the white powder he was cutting was not talcum, the example that young players will be influenced by JAC is not encouraged or denied.But also incurable in our society.
Lets hope they make it so no one suffers' from the hipocrisy for any great length of time.
PS I hate and deplore political correctness, especially salving the ego's of Hipocrits!
Replies
As I asked on another thread , if this were MON or say Ben Rogers , would your opinion be the same ?
So MON got sacked for waving his cock around , we gave him also a lifeline. If it were him caught at yet another event waiving his cock around would you also kick off a thread in his defence ? Or is it only players we need that get your approval for 3rd chances ?
I love a good hypocrisy thread. ..
For the record , I'm good whichever way the club decide here . Not advocating we MUST sack him. Howver you calling people hypocrites has me curious as to your thoughts on my above query ?
That's ok Wiz, but lies and Hypebole come back to the fore when you talk about Hipocrits.
1. Do you know or did you witness anyone seeing MON waving his "cocK" around....after all who takes a male chicken to a Xmas party? The fact that MON dancing naked at a Xmas Party seems to me he was a "jolly good fellow" and into the spirit of things......I further understand that there were no children present and quite a few people took pets to the gala performance. If MON could run as fast as JAC whilst still burdoned with the chicken, then I'm voting for him.
2. For a guy in a Phuket massage parlour who asked his wife to pass a 50 under the door because he was offered a head job by his massuese! there is a smack of hipocrisy there that aligns with the heading of this blog!
I would have thought you could have taken her to MON's Xmas Party rather than leaving him on stage with his cock in his hand!
Hmmmm , well that was a poor attempt at deflection. Back to the drawing board for the next Ploppas Corner idea.
Hook line and sinker Pops.
Is cocaine legal Pops just saying.
All the rest is sermantics.
I think if the club want to keep Josh, they'll be making a decision pretty quickly, before they announce the new ceo as to not let the decision hang over the bosse's head.
If it all goes wrong once again, at least the incoming ceo won't be forced into a corner on why he stood by Josh.
Judging by Josh being in rehab pretty quickly, and his management now putting this out, the club may be thinking of a quick announcement maybe an 8 week suspension recommendation to the NRL