Michael Chammas mentioned this morning that Papenhuyzen has played his last game for the Storm and that they want to play Pezet at 5/8, shifting Munster to fullback.
I don't see Pezet leaving if there is a 5/8 spot open at the Storm, opposed to the Eels
Talataina it is then
Replies
I am so fascinated what they do there. Do they go in house, legend or start a fresh.
Slater being mentioned, as has been Smith. I don't think they take it. Bretnall, Lowrie, Hinchcliffe are the assistants, neither held a HC post before in NRL, only Bretnall in holden cup.
I reckon Willie Peters will get a look in.
Also Sua almost as talented as Pezet if not more. This would be so fucking silly. They'll lose Munster (2027), then Sua, so I can't see them doing this at all.
Yeah i wouldn't move Munster from his best position to accommodate Pezet. Can just move Fa'alogo in for Papenhuyzen.
Thos won't be happening. No way they'll move Munster
How in any discussion is Fa'alogo in the same class discussion as Munster.
I mean seriously Munster's done everything in the game Sua while recency bias tells you he has talent he isn't in the same area code as Munster position regardless.
Sooooooo you would have Munster at Fullback before Fa'alogo?
Nobody is saying Fa'alogo is better than Munster overall, just he is better suited to playing Fullback long term.
I'd have Munster in my team before Fa'alongo position regardless so yes.
Position regardless, if you read you will see I said Munster over Fa'alogo. But at 1 you would rather Munster? Why move Munster anyway? He is quite possibly the best 6 in the world.
Munsters a better player full stop position regardless I'd take him over Fa'alongo today tomorrow next week next month at any position.
Fair enough. But you say position regardless, I don't think anyone would argue against Munster being better than Fa'alogo overall Coryn.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 7 Next