March 15, 2016 12:00am

The Daily Telegraph

EXPLOSIVE new documents reveal the Parramatta Eels board was aware of a need to “secure” more than half a million dollars in third-party agreements to players for the 2014 season.

The confidential boardroom minutes from January 2014, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, show Parramatta leaders pointed to a pressing need to source promised third-party payments of $589,000.

The minutes read: “The board noted that for 2014 there is in the order of $589k in TPA’s (sic) plus 2 cars that are outstanding and need to be secured. (Eels director Peter) Serrao questioned the option of securing commercial revenues and J. Boulous confirmed currently the corporate team are focused on sourcing sponsorship. The board discussed the fact that there needs to be a clear determination as to whether a sponsor wants to be a corporate partner or TPA provider.”

The January 2014 minutes are signed off by Eels chairman Steve Sharp.

Parramatta Eels Chief Executive Officer John Boulous

The NRL requires that third-party agreements must be made at an arm’s length basis from the club to ensure they do not become a way for clubs to use sponsors to thwart the salary cap. It is a breach of the cap rules for a club to be involved in the compensation of a third-party provider in any way.

A Parramatta Eels spokesman last night could not answer whether details of the nearly $600,000 in “outstanding” third-party agreements had been disclosed to the NRL.

When the allegations were put to the NRL last night, a spokesman said: “We’ll investigate any relevant material that comes forward during the inquiry period.”

The latest revelations raise further questions about the positions of Mr Sharp, deputy chairman Tom Issa and chief executive John Boulous.

The documents show the Eels leadership at the time, including Mr Sharp, Mr Issa, Mr Boulous, head of football Daniel Anderson and Peter Serrao, all of whom were present at the meeting, were aware how much players were promised as part of their as-yet unsecured third-party arrangements with the club. The minutes also suggest that leaders at the club were involved in organising TPAs for players.

There is no suggestion of wrongdoing by any players.

On Sunday Mr Boulous launched a defence of the actions of the Parramatta leadership group, stating: “In my time as CEO and under the direction of the board, the club has acted in good faith with the NRL, and we have overhauled and dramatically improved club governance.”

Internal documents published by The Daily Telegraph last week revealed Mr Boulous was allocated up to 50 corporate box tickets for each Eels home game, worth $180,000 a year, at a time where it has become clear the club has been using corporate hospitality to reward third parties.

Meanwhile, it is understood Mr Sharp is standing firm against suggestions senior board members should resign. He said privately on the weekend it would look “weak” if they did so.

Today’s revelations follow The Daily Telegraph’s investigation into the Eels, which found:

● DOCUMENTS showing active discussion by the club’s board of using corporate boxes to reward third-party sponsors of its ­players, in clear breach of salary cap rules;

● $39,000 was made in five payments to Eels star Jarryd Hayne after he had left the club;

● A $27,500 payment was made to former Eel Ben Smith, months after he retired, by a sporting goods manufacturer he had no contract with; and

● SEPARATE third-party contracts involving Hayne and fellow former Eel Will Hopoate.

The revelations raise serious questions over comments made by Mr Boulous on Sunday that he would start an “internal investigation”, given he is mentioned as being present at the January 2014 board meeting.

The minutes of the same meeting also noted the Eels were having salary cap problems.

They state: “The board noted that the club is still over the salary (cap) and D. Anderson will be speaking with football accountant Linda Mittiga and recruitment manager Peter Nolan regarding the numbers that the NRL have questioned. D. Anderson advised that we will need to lose under-20s players to rectify the salary cap situation and provided an update as to the players we are trying to sell.”

The Eels spokesman last night said the club “looks forward to discussing this matter with the NRL”.

“These minutes indicate that head of football advised that it was important that any TPAs should be registered with the NRL as per guidelines with the board also noting that there is a clear difference between corporate partners and TPA providers,” he said.

“The board also discussed opportunities for legitimate options to identify TPAs and MPAs as per NRL guidelines.’’

Mr Sharp last night released a message to Eels fans saying “no stone will be unturned” in examining the claims.

Part of the Parramatta Eels’ boardroom minutes, obtained by The Daily Telegraph

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Well at least we acknowledged the need for a clear difference between sponsors being corporate partners or providing TPAs. That actually flys in the face of a lot of the shit the DT has published the last week..
    • We acknowledged it and ignored it and worked around it, if anything its worse than not acknowledging it.

  • *YAWN*

    Like Hindy said on NRL 360 (or whatever show he was on)

    "wake me up when the punishment gets handed down, until then let's concentrate on the stuff happening on the field"

    • lol im sure he's saying that, Hindy would be all too aware of the dodgy operations of our club, he probably  'found' paper bags in the passenger seat of his car every other month back in the day and his Mrs was given a job on big money at the club just like all the rest, some of these wives are still at the club i think.

  • One thing I picked up from this, and it doesn't really help Parra's case but is still interesting

    The way they are discussing "unpaid TPA's" almost makes it sound like the players were originally signed to legal TPA's these fell through for whatever reason and the club realising that these players will be left shorthanded looked into ways to ensure the players got paid what they were owed and this lead them to obtain illegal TPA's.

    maybe I'm reaching or maybe even the original TPA's were "illegal" however the point being that the TPA's discussed in the meeting were replacement TPA's to players who were being shortchanged by others

    • I think you might be right Dave.

  • There are some eels fans still in massive denial over all this.

  • or Dallas Weston's wife being given the job of official team leg waxer

    That one still makes me laugh

  • is it too early to suggest a poker machine was rigged for Hindy?

    • Hindy just has a brain and doesn't think he would be better at running the board than Sharp and co, unlike the phuck wits on here.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

fishbulb replied to LB's discussion Parramatta announce signing of English International
"And Chris Thorman!"
23 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Gus is great. Respect. But facts before bias. The spine matters. He's still sorting his spine after 5yrs or so. Ours is more settled after a year or so without sugar daddies & Gus' 50yrs of networks. 
 
Ivan Cleary won’t work with him, and the…"
24 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Not in this case the stepping stone is perfect for them not us why would we be paying market value for that.Demand doesn't fall into this conversation because we've basically given them what they want.
We've just lost an international calibre half…"
34 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Parramatta announce signing of English International
"Looks pretty fit for a 47 yo lol.
Keep us up to date on his arrival "
34 minutes ago
More…