Parra signings

Why give up matterson for Carr all we need is a good centre 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • ?

  • Scott rejected by NRL. No cheap centre for parra

    • Is that the case? Sucks if so. Lodge is different though?

      • The Lodge case is over 8 years ago and in a different NRL management era. If that happened today, he would suffer the same fate as Scott; no doubt.

        • Also had help from Wayne Bennett and it being Brisbane.

          Had Roosters wanted Scott i reckon something could have gotten over the line.

          • The management of the N R L we know are Parramatta hatters and it's always been that way .

            • More so loyal to those with figures behind them.

            • Were we even after Scott or do Eel ssupporters have a martyr complex

      • I agree. Lodge is worse if anything. Regardless of wether the decision was right or not, it shows we have no power.

        I think the biggest change need at the club is power within the NRL. It's no surprise the powerful clubs, like East, are at the top of the table year after year. They effectively pressure the NRL to accept signings etc. it is currently too easy for the NRL to say no to us. Unless that changes I can't see us pushing for a premiership. 

  • We are not giving up Matto

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"We are so stacked at fullback that I would move Bloomfield to centre. Bamblett and Davis still there with Papalii and Twiddle in cup. Then we got a player in HM coming through named Lorima Seuseu. Only 16 next year. So a year young for HM. So…"
45 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Kelly done - reports
"I like the signing of Kelly, it gives our outside backs, Russell and Simmonson a bit of competition. Most of the narrative around Kelly's signing has been about his terrible defence. I watched four Titans games from this year, his defence is not as…"
4 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"It's a footy forum, and that should be it. We've lost quite a few good posters the last few years, I don't know whether it's because of politics, religion, racism, language or we have lost them because of the lack of success the club has had for…"
4 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I read a few eels forums and there is always lots of infighting. Seperating the politics is a good idea as it is toxic and devisive. I actually think think the quality of this site has improved somewhat in the last year or so. "
5 hours ago
More…