Why give up matterson for Carr all we need is a good centre
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"eli the aru dont want to offer a contract to lomax "
"Whilst it is a legal cost, the interesting thing is that Storm is paying on his behalf. If Storm come to a deal and Lomax joins them, there would be a argument to say the money is eqivalent to a payment to lomax.
Lomax may see that 250k coming off…"
Lomax may see that 250k coming off…"
"Bit hard when he's on the verge of a medical retirement."
"So no deal, Storm just didn't want to fae the court and get cross examined. Lomax settles for the status quo. Wow I said it last night that it came down to Matterson sleeping on it and once again he turns up in the morning and says nah not helping…"
Replies
?
Scott rejected by NRL. No cheap centre for parra
Is that the case? Sucks if so. Lodge is different though?
The Lodge case is over 8 years ago and in a different NRL management era. If that happened today, he would suffer the same fate as Scott; no doubt.
Also had help from Wayne Bennett and it being Brisbane.
Had Roosters wanted Scott i reckon something could have gotten over the line.
The management of the N R L we know are Parramatta hatters and it's always been that way .
More so loyal to those with figures behind them.
Were we even after Scott or do Eel ssupporters have a martyr complex
I agree. Lodge is worse if anything. Regardless of wether the decision was right or not, it shows we have no power.
I think the biggest change need at the club is power within the NRL. It's no surprise the powerful clubs, like East, are at the top of the table year after year. They effectively pressure the NRL to accept signings etc. it is currently too easy for the NRL to say no to us. Unless that changes I can't see us pushing for a premiership.
We are not giving up Matto
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next