Why give up matterson for Carr all we need is a good centre
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I'm waiting for him to say he is going to play on for another couple of years, as the medical retirement angle hasn't been accessed to date by him or the club. You can't medically retire if you want another contract. Did somebody say Papua New…"
"chief it was agreed by the clubs "
"Arguing for costs is common in the Supreme Court. The losing side commonly cover some of the costs of the winner. The Judge usually decides that before proceedings close. Yes it may have been negotiated, that's also possible. But from my…"
"plus lomaxs costs lol"
Replies
?
Scott rejected by NRL. No cheap centre for parra
Is that the case? Sucks if so. Lodge is different though?
The Lodge case is over 8 years ago and in a different NRL management era. If that happened today, he would suffer the same fate as Scott; no doubt.
Also had help from Wayne Bennett and it being Brisbane.
Had Roosters wanted Scott i reckon something could have gotten over the line.
The management of the N R L we know are Parramatta hatters and it's always been that way .
More so loyal to those with figures behind them.
Were we even after Scott or do Eel ssupporters have a martyr complex
I agree. Lodge is worse if anything. Regardless of wether the decision was right or not, it shows we have no power.
I think the biggest change need at the club is power within the NRL. It's no surprise the powerful clubs, like East, are at the top of the table year after year. They effectively pressure the NRL to accept signings etc. it is currently too easy for the NRL to say no to us. Unless that changes I can't see us pushing for a premiership.
We are not giving up Matto
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next