ONE OR NONE?

 

 There seems to be many fans that are not happy with the 1 year deal for Pezet. Personally, I'm not sure that Pezet and Moses will work as a halves combination.  I see them both as creative game controlling players. I think the best option as a five eighth to play alongside Moses is a bigger body running five eighth. I have no problem with the 1 year deal for Pezet if Ryles has another player in mind for 2027. The Eels look a far better side in 26 with Pezet than without him. 

 

 So the question remains, if Pezet was only wanting a 1 year deal for 2026, would you prefer the Eels didn't offer him the deal at all?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

                • Eli your starting to sounds like your a member of MON's PR team.

                  • Im just not annoyed by a loan deal in any way. 😂 Pezet is here to help the club not hurt it 

          • Cmon hkf. Are you going to be saying this if we're in the top 6 and get through to the second week of finals?  

            And with Footy Dean going,  who was going to be Moses's back up?  Some young kid from sg ball.  Cmon

            • Are you going to be happy if we make the finals in 26 but then miss them again in 27 because we still don't have a long term 6

              • Listen hkf, Pezet wants to play halfback,  thats his best position. He wants halfback money. That's why hes replacing Reynolds. 

                Now he's coming here for 1 season to replace the outgoing Dean as a relief to Moses - why is everyone butt hurt about that ?   Hes a back up.

                Sure we chased him to a longer deal as a 6, but we weren't offering half back dollars, and its not his preferred position 

                • Mate if he signs for 3-4 years he inherits the position all while having long term stability and combinations with the given talent.

                  Instead he come here for a year wiped his arse and then farks off to Brissy for a better deal.Anastas sitting there playing Parra like a fiddle laughing his arse off thanks for being the door mat Parra.Your welcome Braith.

                  • But then if you lock into him long term you'll lose the juniors. Either way you go there will be a negative side of it. Broncos will now lose their juniors to other clubs by signing Pezet over the top. He might be good he might be Brodie Croft. 

                    • Chiefy, do you ever reread your posts.....now lets be honest, your not the sharpest tool in the shed and when it comes to reading and comprehending it is not a strong point....is it!

                      So you have simplified this whole transaction back to Pezet just playing relief for Moses with Dean Hawkins moving....when did Hawkins transition come about and how ?

                      Yes so Pezet will play half in Cup and only come to the one's if Moses is incapacitated......your a fcuking genius .......you have developed beautifully as an apologist for Ryles and he should at least be putting you on his staff as a full time advisor......

                      Now if none of that happens can you go back into the shed, close the fcuking door and figure out how to sharpen your self for your next foray into the garden. Take young Eli in there with you, he will be able to help you did for some more turds!

                    • Poopa you’re so old and dumb, you tried to rewind a Netflix movie with a pencil.

              • The young players in the squad still get to play finals footy and if things fall our way maybe they go a long way into the finals. It's worth doing for sure. If the fit doesn't work out and we struggle then Pezet can be dropped anyway we aren't locked into him 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"You are thinking Clearly HKF. I see it almost identically to you."
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"Poopa you’re so old and dumb, you tried to rewind a Netflix movie with a pencil."
4 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Slippery.'s discussion ONE OR NONE?
"Slippery. I am disappointed in your logic, you are normally a clear thinker.
Moses would never want the 6 on his back at Parra....its his sole ambition to wear that 7 at Parra.
The next thing is you allude to the running 5/8 mythology. When he…"
4 minutes ago
Eels tragic replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"Please tell me that we are fighting to keep walker! Arguably he single handedly gave life to our attack last year!"
19 minutes ago
More…