NRL to make TPA’s transparent

NRL to make backroom deals transparent by revealing how much clubs make from third-party deals

David Riccio, The Daily Telegraph
an hour ago


The NRL will attempt to clean up the scourge of third-party deals by coming clean for the first time with how much all 16 clubs receive from outside sponsors.

The unprecedented overhaul designed to stop salary cap rorting also includes the induction of a new contract system which will require the NRL to receive every formal offer that is made to a player.

The decision which was rubber-stamped by club CEOs in Sydney comes in the wake of three brand-damaging salary cap investigations in as many years involving Parramatta, Manly and currently Cronulla.

“What we’ve tried to do is to put in more checks and balances to help identify any noncompliance with the rules,’’ NRL chief operating officer Nick Weeks said.

“What it also does is it’s going to require clubs, agents and players to jump through more hoops before they register a third-party agreement or signed playing contracts.

“For the first time I think fans, clubs and others will be able to see exactly the volume of third-party agreements that exist in the game and we think that’s a good thing.

“One of the challenges we’ve seen is some misconceptions in the game about the volume with TPAs which has caused some clubs to make bad decisions around the salary cap rules.’’

[​IMG]
Total third-party payments for NRL clubs.

The NRL welcomes third-party agreements as long as the sponsor is not affiliated with the club.

There is also no limit on how many third-party deals a club can register with the NRL.

The Daily Telegraph obtained a first look of the 2018 and 2017 third-party values of every club, which will be made public today.

The figures make for interesting and surprising reading.

Of no great shock is both Melbourne and Brisbane dominate the largest portion of third-party deals.

Their lure as a one-team, one-town franchise and their elite star power are both major factors in their ability to attract just over $1 million in third-party deals for the Storm and just under $800,000 for the Broncos in 2018.

Conversely, the Eels — who were bereft of superstar talent season, managed around $50,000 in TPA’s.

The Warriors inability to boast just over $200,000 additional financial interest in their players despite their vast geographical location is a concern with just over $200,000 in TPAs recorded for 2018.

In 2018, a total of $4.2 million in additional payments were paid to 94 players across 205 different agreements.

TPA deals for players are far-reaching and can be as simple as a boot, headgear or car sponsor to major commercial or corporate meet and greet appearances and work, for a particular business.

“We think being able to understand the proper picture will help clubs, players and agents,’’ Weeks said.

“I think the data we have illustrates clearly that the volume of third-party that exists across the game aren’t as great as some people believe.

“This has been an area that created a lot of attention among fans, among the media and a lot of debate around it is inaccurate.

“So we think that by providing more transparency and accurate information, it will take some of the heat out of the debate and that will only improve our compliance with the salary cap rules.’’

Weeks said the NRL had not contemplated making the full salary of players public, like in the NFL.

But he said a new contract registering system would allow the game to monitor any questionable deal that sees a player sign with a club for a significantly less amount that what he was offered by a rival club.

For example only, if Damien Cook had re-signed at Souths for $600,000 a season when the Broncos had offered $1 million.

“The system will require agents and clubs to lodge (the offer) with the NRL when an offer is made,’’ Weeks said.

“At the moment we don’t see anything until a contract is lodged.

“What we’ll see is competing offers that are made to the player before he makes his decision.

“We think it’s just another tool in our armoury to help us monitor what is going on with contracting activities.

“To the extent that there are some contracts that are done which are unusual in terms of players accepting offers less than other clubs are offering.

“It will allow us to see that.’’

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Second biggest CBD in Australia and we can only manage $50,000 in TPA’s???

    You just can’t compete with the Top Clubs.

    Change your mindset for fcuk sake Parra!!!

    Another thing Roosters 200k in TPA’s? LOL

    • Doesn't include side bets Politis loses to marquee signings
    • Also, i suspect that our clubs brand is still damaged after the issues of 2016. That will take some time to repair. I think that you'll find things will improve a lot when we move back to Parramatta Stadium from 2019
    • 2nd biggest CBD in the country, please. Last week you said it was 4th largest. It’s grown pretty rapidly in a week or two !!!

  • These figures surprise me, I thought they would be a lot higher. Why have a salary cap in the first place if you can top it up, it doesn't make sense.

    If TPA's are here to stay l think it should only be the elite players that can attract these payments, maybe put in a figure were TPA's can start, $700k a season or something like that.

    • This has always been my gripe. You can't have one form of payment that is capped, working in conjunction with one that is not...
      • You can if one has a level of the market making it equitable. Obviously for the NRL with the stupidly bad Sydney centric team distribution this was never going to work though.

        We should just take away the flat cap and turn it into a fairness cap. Take results of the teams for 3 years running and average out their position on the ladder, those at the bottom get more to spend than those at the top. It aims to stop dynasties and get a fairer competition. 

        • I’ll say it again, if you want to make TPA’s irrelevant you have to have a flexible cap, allow teams to exceed the cap to retain their own players but not to recruit players. If a team wants to exceed the cap to retain their own players and keep them together they can, but they can’t then reinforce their roster by recruiting other teams players. 

          Its the only viable solution.

  • The Roosters number is clearly hilarious.

    This is a step in the right direction, but it's a pretty small step. If you want to get real, post the players contract values. Because I'd really like to see how the Roosters were able to beat a team with close to $1,000,000 more spent on their players.

    The rest of the teams come in at around about where I thought they would. But quite honestly this is just hilarious by the Roosters. Their roster and these figures doesn't even get close to adding up.

    Putting the Roosters aside, how on earth are the NRL going to claim it's a fair and even competition when 2 clubs are spending $1m more than nearly all others. No wonder theyve kept this information hidden for so long, and no wonder they've only released half the picture.

    The two points I take from this:

    1) We are at an enormous financial disadvantage to the top clubs and we simply won't be able to compete with them and

    2) The Roosters are so, so, so obviously flaunting the cap and aren't doing it (as most suspected) via legitimately lodged TPAs. So if Uncle Nick is getting his friends to do favours, it's off the books.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"I'd sign for that."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Look i think it is more than just being put on the Wing. I think Flanno is a reason. Wanting to play semi's is another.
I think a move away will be an awakening for Lomax. He was on with Fltech and Hindy with Lawrie in 2022 and he mimicked Griffin.…"
6 hours ago
AlShaw replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"600k is OK for the right winger. The Panthers sets are built on what their back 3 do on tackle one. The more momentum at the start of a set the more expansive a team can play but if our back three are getting smashed on tackle one and two it puts…"
6 hours ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Agree , need to keep him. "
6 hours ago
More…