You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Doesn't matter if he's putting in fully we are revisiting the same situation this time next year.
Does it really matter the Pezet move to me is so in consequential.As above we are revisiting the same discussion next season.
If we want fast track we…"
Does it really matter the Pezet move to me is so in consequential.As above we are revisiting the same discussion next season.
If we want fast track we…"
"lol, I heard it's 2.5 milllion a game. Dont ask me how I know , I just know . "
"If Pezet isn't putting in fully in our jersey, Ryles doesn't seem the kind of character that would fear being honest, sideline, or let go, do you? He doesn't seem to a favorites can stay kind of coach based on name, reputation or family ties..."
Replies
If that's insufficient evidence, the bunker should never rule on an onside ruling ever again
Same with obstruction ruling on Semi, he turned Moanly player inside out and there was no obstruction. Also earlier obstruction ruling against Parra ruled because Parra player run behind own player. However with Moanly no try they also run behind own players but that was not even considered. WTF!
But if you are not a Manly fan, all other fans know they are a filthy club.
Didn't see the touchies flag go up at all either who was in line.
The Jennings smack around the chips was accidental? but how wouldn't he be awarded a penalty for that was mystifying.
Like Gaz's comment that he thought the hit in Jennings was no different to peats on Matai
'Semi run around the back' disallowed try was applying the law too stringently, there was nobody there to impede haha. Still that's the rule however, where was the consistency with think Stewart running around the back of two for the lusaick no try? They didn't even question.
Just so proud the team maintained their discipline and win out in the end, coz after everything a loss in the circumstances would've been gut wrenching to all.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next