NOVEMBER 1 DEADLINE (CROFT)

Just trying to understand the rule around the above date.

My understanding is no player under contract is allowed to negotiate a new deal untill after this date, unless the contracted player gets permission from their current club.

So with that in mind how does the Broncos Head coach get to have a meeting with a Melbourne player (Croft) before this date with no apparent penalty???

Evan Ben Ikin stated on his show that Bellamy must of given permission, to which we now know he didn't.

Am I missing something.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • They can go talk to who ever they want. Just can't sign a new deal until November unless the club has given them permission to sign the new deal. 

  • Two mates having a coffee. 

  • My understanding is that all contracts have an anniversary date of October 31. As a result  a player with less than 12 months left on his contract by November 1st can begin to negotiate with any club.

    In the case of Brodie Croft he has 1 year to run plus an option in his favour and so he may be able to negotiate by November 1

    Notwithdtanding he needs to get permission to negotiate with more than 12 months on his contract and according to Bellamy he did not do that 

    This action further highlights why teams should never sign a player with an option in their favour. It is poor contract management in my view.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Jimeoin replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Does anyone else think that PVL looks like the most dodgy used car salesman you could ever meet?
Apart from him getting games over the line during Covid and becoming a hero as a result, he appears as a shonky character and certainly someone I…"
3 hours ago
TolEllts replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Just so casual calling the game regulator to 'regulate' the Eels to their favor so they can get what they want. Isn't this attitude so demeaning for the Eels treating the organisation as a low life club that they can do whatever they want. Good for…"
3 hours ago
Nitram replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Um excuse me, how is this 'Melbourne Storm asked the NRL to "apply the blow torch" to Parramatta to release Zac Lomax' not the biggest story in nrl history? Is this fairdinkum? This is shocking stuff. Why is the melbourne storm ceo still in his…"
5 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Eelovution, Randy, That's a good idea gents.
Super is a member of the Supporters Group Alliance that meet with club bi-monthly. I'm not part of that committee.
However,  I have a suggestion. Let's set up an appreciation blog where we can write open…"
5 hours ago
More…