Replies

  • Free Thumbs Up Images, Download Free Clip Art, Free Clip Art on ...

  • i believe the idiot touch judge that said Shaun Lane put his foot on the line has been charged

    • will they charge the idiot referee who made countless mistakes?

  • Didn't Newcastle score of the bullshit no advantage on the "foul play" on Ponga? The MRC are saying it shouldn't of even been a penalty in the first place? Then the missed offside from Mitchell Pearce which blind Freddy could of seen. The NRL really need to shake up the referee system, new systems in place for training and a complete overhaul.

    • Complete overhaul yes.

      Promote the best up and comers. Some of which are permanently on touch judge watch, simple because of the politics and the old Sutton regime. Even his wife is being held back. Believe me she is 10 times better than both combined.

       

    • Want to know the funny thing? Annesley said they can't replace referees because they don't have the depth. Want to know why they don't have the depth? Because V'Landiddly in his infinite wisdom sacked a bunch of the part timers, forcing full timers onto the sideline to fill touch judging roles. 

  • Does this include Stefano?

    • No, his case is different. 

    • His Fam have to be tested, if cleared then he sweet - I think?

  • What a fucking surprise! Waqa Blake hits a guy legally and he gets penalised then the NRL says sorry, our mistake after the fact. It's bloody farcical how often Annesley is apologising for mistakes every week.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
3 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
3 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
5 hours ago
More…