Next weeks team who you got

1 gutho

2 sivo

3 penni

4 cartwheel 

5 simo

6 brown 

7 moses

8 greg

9 hodgo

10 jr

11 matto

12 doorey

13 hopgood 

14 hands

15 ogden

16 murchie

17 macka 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I'd leave Simmonsen in the centres. I'd put either Lumelume or Russell on the other wing and get rid of Dunster. Leave powder puff Sivo where he is. I would have Hodgson starting hooker for probably 20-25 minutes then bring Hands on. I'd have Cartwright starting and Matterson on the bench. I like Ogden on the bench in replace of Makatower

    • Simmo will stay in the centre I like cartwheels ball skill plus having another big body wouldn't hurt speed is a drama

    • Lunelume was horrible in reserve grade. Watch the high lights. 

      • Probably because he's being neglected by Brad. When he played a few games in the top side he showed some good qualities bar of course a few errors. I think he has potential but being neglected can dent a players confidence 

        • He is not on a top 30 contact for starters. Last year he couldn't even make the dogs line up. Lumemelu is not the answer

  • Simmo must stay i teh centers and bring luelume in to replace dumpster

  • 1. Gutho

    2. Sivo

    3. Simmonson 

    4. Penisini 

    5. Lumelueme

    6. Brown

    7. Moses

    8. Grieg 

    9. Hands

    10. Paulo

    11. Cartwright 

    12. Davey

    13. Hopgood 

    14. Hodgson (reluctantly)

    15. Matterson 

    16. Doorey

    17. Makatoa 

    • Actually forgot about davey

    • Watch the highlights in cup this week. Lumelume was horrendous 

      • Maybe he was but every player has bad games even the best. Like I said Lumelume needs to be given more opportunities. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
1 hour ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
1 hour ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
3 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
3 hours ago
More…