News Corp banned from 1 Eyed Eel

This morning I received a legal threat from News Corp regarding the reposting of their stories on this site.

Despite the fact the site has operated in its current form for over 15 years, it is now apparently an issue and I have neither the time nor the money to battle this legally. 

While I disagree with their sudden assertion of copyright, particularly given the fact many of their journalists source stories from this site and spin it off as their own, I do not wish to poke the bear.

What does this mean?

It means you cannot copy/paste an entire article from a News Corp site to 1 Eyed Eel.

What can you do?

You can summarise an article and post that on the site. It has to be your own words.

I'm sure some of our site legal eagles can delve deeper into Australian copyright law to explain this, however essentially you can't just rip content straight onto the site.

There's no issue with copying across tweets, or posting articles from the official Parramatta or NRL sites.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Just copy and paste the News article into Copilot and ask it to summarise. Paste the output back into this site. At least we'll be able to get a more consise version of the story without all the crap their "journalists" write.

    I hope you banned them from using 1EyedEel content?

    • I have messaged one of our legal eagles to see if there is anything I can respond to about requiring acknowledgement of 1 Eyed as a source when their "journalists" lift info from this site and pass it off as their own.

      • Super, publishers use this type of scare tactics quite often. Was it a cease and desist letter? 

        • It did mention cease and desist, but it came from one of their editors, not their legal counsel.

          • This reply was deleted.
          • If it didn't come from legal then I personally would ignore it and tell them to go *uck themselves.
            Warning letters from publishers are always from legal not editorial.

            I'm guessing one of their editors is pissed off with the way we slag their articles and journos. Maybe a bold piece of shit put them up to it.

            • I've got one of our site legal brains looking at it for me.

      • great if they are using our commentary for their news articles we should do the same

        • I did think about that. Maybe we have to pop some bait up at some point.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

KENDOZA replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"He would work well with mitch. We would have the two best kickers in the game"
1 hour ago
paul taylor replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Lorenzo is a generational talent. In both trials he barely ran the ball. Once he gets that out of the bag, you will see how lethal a talent he is. He has great footwork and a fantastic initial 30 metres in him.  I really look forward to watching him…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Burton would be a great 6 to have, but there's no doubt we'd have to get into a bidding war to win his signature. As soon as that happens the move loses appeal for me because he's not worth the salary Bulldogs had to pay to bring him over from the…"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R1 vs STORM: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"You're on the money as usual Coryn, but also, when the Storm are getting no reward late in the tackle, their 6 7 and 9 resort to angled grubbers thru our line or staying with angle lob one to allow their winger to catch and drop down over line.…"
1 hour ago
More…