Replies

  • 13072892495?profile=RESIZE_930x

  • 1. Iongi

    2. Lomax (Centre experiment will fail)

    3. Penisini

    4. Simonsson

    5. Vunivalu

    6. Brown

    7. Moses

    8. Ofahengaue

    9. Brailey

    10. Paulo

    11. Guymer

    12. Tuilagi

    13. Hopgood

    14. Papalii

    15. Lane

    16. Matterson

    17. Williams

     

    • Dump Tuilagi from the 17 and promote either 15, 16 or 17 to his spot and that's spot on. 

    • When did we sign Vunivalu?

      • We didn't its just a rumour but i didnt want to put russell 

        • Ah lol

    • Dreamland with lomax

  • Ilike this one Chiefy.

    I honestly thought Lussick was told he wasnt wanted and was heading back to the uk. Not sure how that has progressed. Can someone give BA a call to take Lussick off our hands please.

  • I don't love it but I'm trusting Ryles.

    1. Iongi
    2. Vunivalu*
    3. Penisini 
    4. Lomax
    5. Papalii
    6. Brown
    7. Moses
    8. Matterson
    9. Brailey
    10. Paulo
    11. Hopgood
    12. Cartwright
    13. Ofahengaue
    14. Guymer / Gutherson^
    15. Moretti
    16. Williams
    17. Samrani / Doorey
    18. Kelma

    I think this team is unlikely but what I'd love to see. Big Powerful pack through the middle. Dynamic leg speed on the bench.

    * not signed, but we need him. If we don't sign him Martin, AMS, Tago, Richard Penisini, Russell, Twiddle, all as good as eachother but we clearly need an experienced first grade winger.

    ^ if Gutherson leaves we should start blooding our future captain Guymer and would need Samrani's aparant versatility.

     

     

    • Samarani is on a train and trial contract and they cannot play round 1. He is top 30 in 2026

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
1 hour ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
1 hour ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
3 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
3 hours ago
More…