Replies

            • Yo the Cookie Monster

  • Is that a 'New Sign'? or a 'New Signing'? as both are just slightly different.

    • Mr A has corrected his post - originally it said new sign imminent - so my new sign is the correct one.

  • We can now cross Nofoaluma off the list.

    He has resigned with the Tigers.

    • Yep, so much for all of that talk!

      • I'm glad we didn't get him. Tigers went real hard to keep him, 4 years for big money is a big risk and he's not that young either he's 27. Rather target a youngster that's worth while. Xavier Coates maybe??

        • My first choice was the fox but the dogs got him.

          My 2nd choice was Coates and I would be going all out to get him. He would be the perfect replacement for Fergo when he finishes with us at the end of this season.

          • Absolutely!!  

          • Coates will end up at Melbourne, watch this space.

            • I think you are right Alan.

              The Titans are chasing him hard to but I can definitely see him ending up at the Storm.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
1 hour ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
1 hour ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
3 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
3 hours ago
More…