The National Youth Competition is set to be scrapped as part of a massive overhaul of the pathways to NRL progression.

The under-20s competition was ushered in with much fanfare in 2008, billed as the chance to showcase the best young talent in the game.

But the Holden Cup will cease to exist when the current broadcast deal concludes at the end of 2017 and replaced by age-based competitions aligned with NSW and Queensland Cup teams.

The ARLC has conducted extensive research on the current pathways to the elite level and there is a belief the NYC isn't serving as the best possible transition from elite junior to first grader.

Advertisement
It's understood the new state-based competitions would feature under-18s and under-20s age groups, which would then feed talent through to the current open-age NSW and Queensland Cup competitions.

The plan is for the champion team from each state to play off on grand final day, as will be the case when the VB Cup and Intrust Super Cup winners will for the first time in October.

"That is certainly something we'll look at as part of the next broadcast rights agreement," an NRL spokesperson said.

One of the problems plaguing the current NYC tournament is the exorbitant running costs.

This round alone, six U20s teams – the Bulldogs, Tigers, Roosters, Eels, Raiders and Storm – will travel interstate, while the Sharks head across the Tasman to take on the Warriors.

The travel and accommodation costs are a huge impost to clubs, many which are already struggling financially. Under the new system, there will be huge savings almost all games will be played along state lines.

The overhaul will also address concerns that many talented youngsters were leaving the game if they didn't transition straight from NYC to the NRL.

Another concern about the current system is that the best young players aren't on show in the under-20s anyways, as those poised to get a call up to first grade were being blooded against seasoned players in the NSW Cup to prepare them for the rigours of the big time.

Even before the NYC was introduced, there were concerns that it wouldn't serve its purpose.

Back in 2007, Des Hasler predicted it would be a "glorified SG Ball competition", with fellow coaches Wayne Bennett, Neil Henry and Ivan Cleary outspoken about their preference for blooding their gun juniors in the open-age competitions.

Holden's sponsorship, along with broadcast commitments, mean there can be no changes for another two-and-a-half years. However, the ARLC believe the changes will further boost the profile of the state-based competitions while still giving broadcasters an attractive television product.

NYC initiatives, such as the 'no work, no study, no play' edict, are likely to remain to ensure juniors have post-football careers to fall back on.

One of the challenges for the League is than not every NRL club has its own NSW or Queensland Cup affiliate. Melbourne and Cronulla, for instance, both provide players for the Sharks' feeder club side.

However, that situation could soon change as Cronulla are in negotiations to partner with Newtown from next season.

The Jets' nine-year association with the Roosters will soon come to an end after the premiers opted to link with Wyong to give them a crack at the talent on the Central Coast.

Cronulla CEO Steve Noyce has a good relationship with Jets officials from his time at the Roosters and there is a possibility a Sharks-Jets association could be formalised by the end of the week.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/national-youth-competition-to-be-scrapped-as-league-officials-go-back-to-the-drawing-board-20140809-1028og.html#ixzz39xsGAglS

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • about time.

  • Isn't there already a state based Under 18's competition for both NSW and QLD? SG Ball and Cyril Connell cup.

    • Mal meninga Cup is QLD 18s Cyril Connell is 16s
  • The Sunday Footy show stated that Dave Smith wanted to bring in a draft for young players. The details of this had not been worked out yet. This was to coincide with the 2017 rights deal.

    Clubs would not want to spend money developing players, only for them to be drafted to a new club. This may suggest that the NRL itself would have to pay for the lower grade comps.

    If the NRL are restructuring the lower grades, it makes sense they would attempt to work the draft into it also.
    • Assuming this means only one game on match day? Or perhaps a mighty contest of Wenty v Wyong. Not sure this has been completely thought through. Smith has never come across as being in touch with the average supporter. I think tweaking the concept perhaps under 23s with a couple of spots also for a few overage players that fall within the clubs top 25 and have them in a parra strip is a necessity.
    • The draft on the other hand is terrible idea. How will the NRL possibly develop all the kids coming through? Our system is unique in that we have kids in our club systems from 13 yo. US sports have far superior college and high school systems that have superior resources than NRL clubs. They develop them independently of the professional teams and therefore the players have no allegiances therefore can be drafted. One thought was that the NRL would pay clubs to develop them but why would we use our coaches who may be better to develop played for other clubs? The NRL don't have the coaches to develop elite players.
    • The ARU currently use a centralised coaching model. They gave their junior gold squads it is a shambles and doesn't work. It's then up to schools to pick up the slack. The AFL dont fund all junior development either the junior clubs do. How will NRL clubs not be directly involved? Assuming there is still a Harold Matts competition they would still be coached and developed by NRL clubs in their methods. Should the NRL consider foregoing the HM competition they will be destroying the fabric of the game and what keeps the juniors in our game. Might as well come with a full page newspaper add welcome AFL, Union and soccer to all our junior players. The ARU has just this year started their own junior rep competition to battle league at 15 and 17 year level to try and combat the player drain at junior level to league.
    • There was a suggestion that clubs could hand pick 5 players to be exempt from the draft. If this is the case, then why have a draft at all.
  • Cheers, I knew it was one or the other just wasn't 100% sure. Just went with Cyril Connell.

  • The draft would be the worst thing to happen to league. I think the way we develop our junior talent is the best way possible we just need better competitions to develop that talent.

    I would hate to see the high schools take more responsibility on developing players. School should be for developing skills outside of league.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Why did fans want Ryles head after 1 game ?
"It is a mixture. But saying MON is the reason for Pezet is farcical. Ryles would have wanted it and MON got it done. That is practically MON's job. Same with GM's in other sports. Get an idea of what the coach wants, goes out and gets the best he…"
8 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Xerri
"Yeah that is what i am referring to. He mentioned he is signed til 2028, but there has not been announcement made. So whether it was agreed but something happened whether money changed or length or maybe Richie's contract status is different and…"
13 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Ryles/Moses comments on Pezet
"Might be a with a new coach. If Brisbane miss the 8 or scrape in i reckon they yeet Madge. It would be ridiculous but can see it happening.
So could have a brand new coach there for him lol."
17 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Ryles/Moses comments on Pezet
"He had great vision to catch Walsh out twice, but man his execution on kicks were woeful, yet fluked a try and try assist. You cannot ever win without some form of luck."
18 minutes ago
More…