Eels don't want him, he's burned that bridge and club has already moved forward with players they trust. He'll end up in Melbourne but we should at least get Howarth out of it
I'm well aware the Eels dont want him but logically its they are the only 2 scenarios that make sense unless the biased NRL come in and screw us over like usual
How do we not have any cap space? Makes no sense that we have so many players leave and we replace a fraction of the numbers and we have no cap space?? mind boggling
Kelly would have taken some, then we re-signed a host of players who get upgrades for this year, include Pezet in that too.
We have cap space but not enough to accommodate Lomax for full price and fill the final spot in our top 30. We might have $800k left, 2 spots. Lomax takes all that money and we have one spot to fill.
We just offered keon 1mill how the fuck do we not have cap space, what are you smoking? Lomax was on 650k, we never replaced dbrown, and braith said we signed pezet for unders this year. We have a war chest.
"We just offered keon 1mill how the fuck do we not have cap space, what are you smoking? Lomax was on 650k, we never replaced dbrown, and braith said we signed pezet for unders this year. We have a war chest."
"Kelly would have taken some, then we re-signed a host of players who get upgrades for this year, include Pezet in that too.
We have cap space but not enough to accommodate Lomax for full price and fill the final spot in our top 30. We might have…"
"How do we not have any cap space? Makes no sense that we have so many players leave and we replace a fraction of the numbers and we have no cap space?? mind boggling
"
"Well in fairness, we thought too that the contract he signed, with his own free will, would be enough, as it should be.
Plus we probably felt we wanted him gone."
Replies
Eels don't want him, he's burned that bridge and club has already moved forward with players they trust. He'll end up in Melbourne but we should at least get Howarth out of it
I'm well aware the Eels dont want him but logically its they are the only 2 scenarios that make sense unless the biased NRL come in and screw us over like usual
Well we technically cannot do that even if we wanted him as we don't have the cap space to accommodate him.
How do we not have any cap space? Makes no sense that we have so many players leave and we replace a fraction of the numbers and we have no cap space?? mind boggling
Kelly would have taken some, then we re-signed a host of players who get upgrades for this year, include Pezet in that too.
We have cap space but not enough to accommodate Lomax for full price and fill the final spot in our top 30. We might have $800k left, 2 spots. Lomax takes all that money and we have one spot to fill.
We just offered keon 1mill how the fuck do we not have cap space, what are you smoking? Lomax was on 650k, we never replaced dbrown, and braith said we signed pezet for unders this year. We have a war chest.
We should not of agreed to his release in the first place. You just watch parra get dudded now the nrl steps on.
V'landys is full of shit pokes his chest out threatning 10 year bans blah blah blah. He's full of hot air.
Well in fairness, we thought too that the contract he signed, with his own free will, would be enough, as it should be.
Plus we probably felt we wanted him gone.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next