Munster or Cleary ?

How do you compare the two halfbacks 

me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. 
if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market 

  • Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough. 

  • As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.

    If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks 

    • I think he meant half's not halfbacks. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9

  • Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback. 

    Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster. 

    Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.

    • Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.

      Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....

      Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
6 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
8 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
8 hours ago
More…