me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 596
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
"One thing I do know is, sometimes the courts work in mysterious ways. You could have your T's crossed and i's dotted and still the courts find a way to punish you. Only winners here are the lawyers."
"Exactly right Randy. The fact that this is going on for so long clearly shows that the NRL are going to back Melbourne and Lomax, otherwise they would have stepped in long ago and put a stop to this circus. Parra taking things to court was a great…"
"Hey Captain-thoughts on what Lomax' legal team will be using as their defence option? Restraint of trade? Signing agreement under duress? Virtually impossible to see how he wins this given he had legal representation when signing the agreement. Is…"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next