me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 596
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
"Lomax does because that's the angle he's going to use to try and win this thing all this is really is who spins this the best in court.There's going to be no right or wrong here but who presents the best case facts regardless."
"It's where it all starts.
Off the field is in sync the flow on effect is exactly that it finds its way through all facets of your franchise.Basically it's what Parra's been missing for so long.Its why I've never understood why the fans always go…"
"I just think winning this sends a broader message about the club is all losing it keeps us in that losing limbo.Feel good position will dictate that we stood up at least gave it a crack against the big gun Melbourne but ultimately came up short.…"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next