me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 596
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
"Remember years ago, circa 2019, when the NRL used to publish "official" TPAs? One year, the Eels had a lot more than the Roosters, who had something like 50K or whatever it was. Politis would have been chuckling. I was. It's telling the NRL don't…"
"A soft cap would help level the playing field, and help us on the 'big name" recruitment side, even if it's impossible to ever have a truly level playing field and players look for many things besides money.
But I don't think the powerbrokers at the…"
"Good blog, Bluey. Your concerns are fair. Where we differ is what “all in” means. I don’t think we are "all in" only on juniors. We are "all in" trying to improve across the whole footy spectrum.
We have got plenty of recent imports. Iongi, Walker,…"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next