How do you compare the two halfbacks
me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him.
if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
Our spine was great before the loss of Mahoney.
If we had kept our spine we would have very few issues next year. Yes a couple more outside backs would be handy and our 2nd row has lost some grunt but keep your spine together and the rest falls in place. Just ask Melbourne.
I know some people think we will be fine with Hodgson next year but we won't.
Yes he was great a few years back but our spine has been together for a long time and you just can't replace that.
Moving DB to hooker is one of the dumbest suggestions I have ever heard. He is a 5/8 and will be one of the best in the game.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next