Munster or Cleary ?

How do you compare the two halfbacks 

me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. 
if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market 

  • Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough. 

  • As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.

    If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks 

    • I think he meant half's not halfbacks. 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9

  • Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback. 

    Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster. 

    Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.

    • Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.

      Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....

      Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"Though do Melbourne see this as a chance to win in 2026? Bellamy's last year more likely."
49 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Melbourne have everything to do with the release agreement if they've already signed, or taken action to sign Lomax outside the terms of the agreement....exactly, but they would not have done that unless the NRL gave them the thumbs up. We don't…"
50 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"LB, me too.
A swap deal is not impossible. The issue is that while there may be legal leverage, Lomax remains a risky exchange and likely a temporary sugar hit.
If I were another club, I would not want to lose long term quality players for him, as…"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Exactly Yobz! He still signed it after knowing R360 was off table for couple a years too, but RU was there as he agreed and looked into signing up to! It wasn't that he didn't have a chance to play that...just the offer of 450K wasn't enough. Tough,…"
1 hour ago
More…