me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 596
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
"Well i forgot who here said it but the report was he took Tuivaiti under his wing and that is why he stayed. I reckon he is doing the same to Talagi and Brown. They all talk how good Moa is with the Polyneasian boys but Paulo, added with the respect…"
"Yep, I'd much rather Paulo on our side than in the opposition. He had one of his best seasons for many years this year and is still strong and skilful. As you say, I can see Junior in a mentoring role for the younger players."
"Add to that the long list of rookies at the club, many of which were thrown into NRL last season. It's not quite Dad's Army, but the club does need to ensure that we continue to have the right mix of experience and youth."
"Yep people so focused on just performances rather than how good of a role model he is for Polynesian boys which make up more percentage of nrl players each year"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next