me personally I prefer Cleary. I think he will be even better in the future. But so is Munster unless grog ruins him. if you could buy one of those two. Who would it be
Views: 596
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
"The Vlandys support of Lomax continues with a release today, commenting that the current actions are affecting Lomax's mental health. Mental health is a serious issue and should not be used as an argument to change the public discussion and position…"
"Good to see some Russell love, but it was only a trial game against an ordinary Cronulla reserve grade side. Russell probably had the most first-grade experience of anyone out there. Let's see how the next six months pan out."
"We had a decent hit out, in saying that the sharks didn't throw to much at us.
i thought T Brown looks really good, maybe a debut this year.
Pryke looked good, except for he's hands
twiddle and Lorenzo looked pretty solid as well.
our juniors are…"
Replies
Depending on your teams needs, Cleary is more of an organizer and would be more valuable on the open market
Munster for me he is unpredictable while Cleary is Predictable. We don't need predictable we already have enough.
Exactly
Bingo. Cleary is just Moses with bigger balls.
As chief stated it depends on who your other half is but cleary is the more valuable player and is far more consistent than Munster, with Munster you get wow plays that you don't with cleary.
If I was starting a team from scratch I would take cleary without hesitation.
That's what's unique about the storm, Hughes, Paps and Munster are all fullbacks
I think he meant half's not halfbacks.
Gutherson isn't a centre. He's a fullback and maybe a number 9
Munster is a 5/8 not a halfback.
Dyl will be every bit as good as Munster by the time he reaches his age so we don't need Munster.
Cleary is the best halfback in the game but Moses is in the top 3 so happy to keep him.
Coryn and you a right Bem... someone obviously told Grunta at the funny farm that's what happens when you change what we now know is a very good spine.
Why would/should change that when we have obviously issues in the centres, wings and edges (post this season)....
Pereham at full back is average, he hardly cuts them up in Reserve Grade and whilst he is handy, he is not good enough, fast enough or tough enough, go back to planting "spuds" Grunts.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next