Bulldogs have pulled out of the race for Metcalf and his asking price is around 1 million dollars. Dragons most likely spot but to get him immediately I wonder if this means they will allow Sua to join us early to free up cap space to get Metcalf immediately. Just seems logical
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Here we go, passing the buck again super on Mark o'neill and recruitment. Thats like saying the recruitment personnel under Phil Gould at the dogs are more responsible for the roster than Phil is.
What a massive load of bullshit . Nobody believes you.
Was Phil Gould the most influential person in R and R at Penrith super?
Is Head of football Phil Gould themost influential person in recruitment at the Bulldogs super. Why isn't the hof the most responsible for the roster at Parramatta.
But at Parramatta o'neill isn't the most responsible for the roster. Unbelievable. Do you think the average fan is that naive????
Ooh, can I help? So, Chiefy wants Daniel Anderson back as GM so the Eels can go spoon, 10th, 12th? Oh yeah, also so that the Eels can breach the salary cap, get fined half a million, and get docked competition points.
Please, Chiefy, we would all really love to hear why THAT is the kind of management you want at the club?
I don't want Anderson i want Richardson. Been saying ut all along
Either you guys put your case forward on mark o'neill or don't comment.
These are your opinions
Issues with Richardson were pointed out. Galvin and Luia were lost under his watch or under eye conditions of contracts he made, for instance.
If we can critique MON for Brown's get our clauses then Richardson is on the hook for same. What do you make of that?
Daz, quick question...if we leave MON plodding along (I mean, no-one would say that he is crushing it, right?) when would be the appropriaye time to shuffle him along? 10yrs? 15? but won't it just be more scapegoating then? Or must we wait for an egregious "fuck-up for the ages" before moving him on?
The time feels up for him so folks are gonna come at him, unfairly or not.
Shake it up a bit. Punt him now. It's for the best. What's the worst that can happen, he doesn't seem to do a lot. Retaining MON feels political. I would bet that he is a happy loyal lapdog....Goodboy Mark.....who's a goodboy
Fair questions, Randy. If it's not obvious, my consistent point has been that arguments to remove MON that rest solely on selected retention and recruitment decisions are faulty. They rely on distributed responsibility being reduced to sole responsibility and conflating that with accountability. That is a recipe for scapegoating and a poor argument.
Poor arguments won't breed good decisions.
Not a fair question from Randolph....call him Rudolph for this discussion.
He fcuks up when he says "he doesn't seem to do a lot" its that type of argument that disqualifies himself.
Personally if I'm replacing MON I'm chasing Braith Anasta. I believe he has the gravitas, respect and pull that we need to get things done
AE, i actually do not mind that pick. Being close to Ryles if a spot was to open up is a realistic option.
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
of 10 Next