Posted by Kerry George on March 17, 2016 at 8:11am
It appears if we had rolled the dice that Manu Mau would have been found not guilty for an identical tackle to Matt Scott. He decided to plead guilty and stand down for one match.
It only happens to Parra
Views: 0
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
The judiciary should review every charge instead of having them having to plead guilty first. The match review should be made to answer as after last night they made 3 wrong decisions and by default got Mau charge wrong too.
Similar to having the ref make a decision on a try when they didnt see it properly, then having the bunker be 100% to overrule. Makes no sense.
If you commit the same offence and one gets off and the other doesnt its BS. An offense is an offense.
Manu's was worse than scott's if i you ask me. Put me in the same tackle and id rather have the scott tackle than the mau one. Hard to say as a parra fan but i say it how it is.
Hahaha yeah alright buddy!! Scotts was way worse he actually jumps down with force, manu's he just laid down on him by accident, yeah both were accidental but Scotts was much worse.. Sure your a parra fan
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
Replies
The judiciary should review every charge instead of having them having to plead guilty first. The match review should be made to answer as after last night they made 3 wrong decisions and by default got Mau charge wrong too.
Similar to having the ref make a decision on a try when they didnt see it properly, then having the bunker be 100% to overrule. Makes no sense.
If you commit the same offence and one gets off and the other doesnt its BS. An offense is an offense.
If he challenged it he more than likely would have gotten off