Eels Blogs

Replies

• 

  RIDER March 17, 2016 at 8:20am

  The judiciary should review every charge instead of having them having to plead guilty first. The match review should be made to answer as after last night they made 3 wrong decisions and by default got Mau charge wrong too.

  Similar to having the ref make a decision on a try when they didnt see it properly, then having the bunker be 100% to overrule. Makes no sense.

  If you commit the same offence and one gets off and the other doesnt its BS. An offense is an offense.
• 

  Mac5733 March 17, 2016 at 8:28am

  anyone suprised??? I'm sure not.
• 

  Rosemont March 17, 2016 at 8:42am

  Parra never challenge anything their to scared. Good luck to Scott. Fortune favours the brave.
• 

  Nitram March 17, 2016 at 8:58am

  Manu's was worse than scott's if i you ask me. Put me in the same tackle and id rather have the scott tackle than the mau one. Hard to say as a parra fan but i say it how it is.
  • 

    est_88 > Nitram March 17, 2016 at 9:54am

    Hahaha yeah alright buddy!! Scotts was way worse he actually jumps down with force, manu's he just laid down on him by accident, yeah both were accidental but Scotts was much worse.. Sure your a parra fan
• 

  Outrunna March 17, 2016 at 9:02am

  Kerry, the difference is that Scott challenged his charge and Ma'u took the plea.
  If he challenged it he more than likely would have gotten off
• 

  rappetite94 March 17, 2016 at 9:05am

  Plus matt scott hasnt gone to the judiciary for over 8 years.