You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
Replies
Sharks don't want him. He's a forward under 30.
I don't know that I'd be making comments like that one Super, given our history of signing over 30s forwards in recent years ....
How many forwards over 30 have we signed? Beau Scott, Vave and Watmough in the past 6 seasons?
T-Rex - 29
Mannah - 30
Vave - 33 (31 when we signed him)
Matagi - 30 (28 when we signed him and now overseas)
Evans - 26
Terepo - 26
Tepai - 22
Alvaro - 25
Ma'u - 29
Niukore - 22
Gower - 32 (28 when we signed him)
I've maintained that anyone claiming we have some kind of retirement home for ageing forwards is complete BS and someone looking for a lazy excuse as to why we've struggled this year.
Ive thought all along we are a good chance to get him, id not be suprised if you are right here Tone
I don't know if he will make our squad unless we lose Vave and possibly a couple of our backrowers.
Paulo, Mahoney, Tapau
Lane, Moreoa
Brown
Reserves
Nuikore, Mannah, Alvaro and a Utility is a handy pack indeed except it means no Vave,Mau and Evans.
I think you need a spot for Terepo as well
He specifically said "may yet come" poppa....context mate :)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
of 4 Next