Mark o'neill 

* failed with the get out clauses 

* failed with attracting top players 

* The Brown contract was a complete stuff up

* Needed Ryles to hold his hand to finally fix development, where previously reserve grade was a holding yard for rejected players 

* lost out on recent big name signings 

 

Shane Richardson 

* A proven winner

* Helped Souths become champions

Took the Cronulla sharks from perennial losers to grand finalists 

* attracted many big names to the Tigers despite being 3 times losers. Jerome Luai,  Taylan May ect

* A noted track record of success and attracting big talent. 

Make it happen now.

At the moment  - we're wasting time and O'neill a dead man walking 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We need to know what's going wrong in the first place, you certainly wouldn't  stop someone like Richardson even coming in as a consultant for our recruitment team to learn off.

    Richardson has 30 years experience and has been at Cronulla, Penrith, Hull, Souths, Tigers

    Have a look at his record and the players he has signed from other clubs.

    Jarohme Luai Penrith to Tigers

    Sunia Turuva Penrith to Tigers

    Terryl May to Tigers

    Greg Inglis Melbourne to Souths

    Sam Burgess England to Souths

    Latrell Mitchell Roosters to Souths

    Pinched premiership winning coach coach John Lang Cronulla to Penrith

    Preston Campbell Dally M winner to Penrith

    Signed representaive half back Paul Green to Cronulla

     

    Shane Richardson has  built a reputation as a high-stakes negotiator capable of landing transformative, marquee talent for struggling clubs. His signature move often involves luring established stars from premiership-winning systems to lead a "rebuild. Why we wouldn't at the very least get him in even to compliment what we have now. Its not working as it is at the moment.

     

     

     

     

     

    • Yep great write up.  Exactly why we need to get Richardson.  

    • Too true, he has what MON obviously doesn't which is that ability to talk a player into the club. Like Anderson at Dragons would have talked Keaon into coming. That is why I have been in favour bringing Brian Smith back. Also, getting Luai gets the other players like Turuva and May over. We need that player where other players go "hang on, if he's going there I want in."

      When I spoke to my mate who knew James Galvin, he said that James told him he love Ryles and was so impressed with him. I asked what about MON and all James said was "nice guy" nothing massive nothing like impressive just a nice guy.

      We need a prick like though Tripp was a prick to us in this Lomax saga he is the type we need at Parra. I wonder when it gets to the point where Ryles, as I believe he is the one to start the ball rolling as he is not getting what he needs with so many failed attempts, where MON is moved on for someone else.

      i reckon Richo would come here too. He is spoke about a lot with Penrith's and Souths premiership drought, he would want the same for Parra. 

      MON's forte is bargains. He would be great for Perth for example, new squad who need to ace depth to be competitive and would be able to find those gems that need a new start or haven't been given a start.

  • The stink around our club as perenial losers....no new head od football can fix that...the only thing that can is winning on the pitch.....at the moment that looks problematic....we become regulars in the finals we get tje elite player.

    Further Ryles has surounded himself with proven losers ....

    but hey its only Rd 1 ....a win in Brisbane is a must for our season 

  • I know your can't keep them all but not keeping sanders who wins the game for the raiders and buying a reserve grade half in pezet. Is a bit hard to take.  Hopefully we don't lose to many from this crop coming through. 

    • Well Sanders path was blocked. By the time he left Brown and Moses still had contracts til 2029 at least. Despite being options they had deals.

      It would have been a bigger risk letting Brown or Moses walk to accommodate Sanders.

      Who would have foreseen Newcastle offering insane money.

      Cannot live in Hindsight.

      • But that's the thing. Sanders path was not blocked at all. When someone actually looked at Brown's contract he was only contracted until the end of 2025. The club could not have fucked this situation up anymore if they tried. If the R&R team were across the details they could have either solidified Brown's options so he was locked in or locked in Sanders because Brown was leaving. 
        Sanders and Brown both leaving was ridiculous and straight up incompetence from our R & R team. 

        • It was, as he had control of his contract. If you are Sanders' agent and Parra say here is a 3 year deal til 2027. You see Moses signed til 2028 with options and Brown til 2031 with options. But Canberra have a 3 year deal with Fogarty having one year left. Canberra are the option as way better chance to play sooner. Parra would do a lot to keep Moses and Brown. Again nobody foresaw Brown getting $1.4mil.

          I have gone through this so many times and people just look at it now and say path was not blocked. It was. You cannot tell me there is was situation where Parramatta could say to Sanders you'll get game time full-time soon. Added to that if his agent said let Brown or Moses go, they will say no way.

          Parra had options in the deal believing he would stay. Hindsight now says "oh we should have kept Sanders" well when he left Brown still had a deal til 2031 and Moses then 2029 by the time Brown made his call. 

           

          • Parra want to keep Sanders. You go to Brown and say we need you to commit today and take your options off the table. If he hesitates you give him permission to shop around. Either way it needs to get resolved because we have a young half we do not want to let go of. 
            When Ryles came here one of the first things he did was to solidify Moses' contract to remove options. It can be done.

            What you don't do is allow young players to leave and cross your fingers that your current halves choose to stay if they feel like it. 

            • Though I believe they wouldn't want to take the risk of Brown leaving. That's now changed with Ryles but Moses more so was sweetened with captaincy and be committed.

              but also who is to say we wanted him as a 6 and he wanted to be a 6? Similar to Pezet at the moment.

              But at same time that regime, still here, admitted to their mistakes and now hopefully do not go down that route again. I've come across to Talagi being a dumb choice to give him an option.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Alfred replied to Alfred's discussion The next generation
"I hope you're right Paul. Need to end the drought "
2 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Izack Tago dropped to bench for Penrith
"Chatter on Tago to Eels getting louder but i actually do not want Lomax going to Penrith in a swap as that means he more likely wins a comp and do not want him rewarded hahaha. But also, i feel if we hang on long enough, with Tago being on so much…"
15 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Mark O'neill out - Shane Richardson in
"We'll also be looking for a new ceo next year too won't we as JS has done 8 years on the Parra board and by constitution 9 is the most they can stay on it.Please correct me if I'm wrong.
MoN why bother getting rid of him now why have we just…"
16 minutes ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Izack Tago dropped to bench for Penrith
"Ummm when Penrith signed him he was playing park footy in Newcastle. At the time we were rebuilding it would have been a dud signing opinion by most here. 
Unless you were talking about when Alamoti came in for him late in the year, in that case…"
17 minutes ago
More…